University of Exeter
Browse

A preliminary study to identify data needs for improving fit of hand and wrist orthosis using verbal protocol analysis

Download (3.65 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-01, 10:46 authored by X Tan, W Chen, J Cao, S Ahmed-Kristensen
The delayed delivery, poor fitting and discomfort of customised orthoses are reported in rehabilitation clinics as resulting in more invasive interventions. The current practice of orthosis customisation relies heavily upon the experience and fabrication processes of therapists. In order to better understand the current practice, and thus identify data that is required for better comfort moving towards a data-driven customisation, this article describes a study generating working models of therapists. Customisations of hand and wrist orthoses for 18 patients were observed. Verbal protocol analysis was employed to extend the current understanding of fabrication processes. Working models of four therapists were established with quantitative evaluation on major phases, interactive activities and iterations of performing tasks during fabrication, revealing different working models between in- and out-patient departments (e.g. fabrication for in-patients was more complex and focussed on ergonomic fitting whereas fabrication for out-patients paid attention to durability) which were qualitatively explained. Practitioner summary: Fit and comfort are imperative for orthosis design and fabrication, however the current practice of customisation of an orthosis relies upon the experience of individual hand therapist. The article presents working models of hand therapists, and relevant data that would enable customisation of orthosis for better fit. Abbreviations: VPA: verbal protocol analysis; h&w: hand and wrist; LTT: low temperature thermoplastic; ANOVA: analysis of variance.

Funding

Affiliated Xuzhou Rehabilitation Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University

China Scholarship Council

Imperial College London

Xuzhou Central Hospital

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Notes

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record

Journal

Ergonomics

Publisher

Taylor & Francis / Institute for Ergonomics and Human Factors

Version

  • Accepted Manuscript

Language

en

FCD date

2020-10-15T09:29:49Z

FOA date

2021-09-15T23:00:00Z

Citation

Vol. 64 (2), pp. 259 - 272

Department

  • Management

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC