University of Exeter
Browse

A systematic review of the implementation of learner‐centred pedagogy in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Download (498.92 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-01, 15:19 authored by N Sakata, N Bremner, L Cameron
This article provides a comprehensive descriptive overview of the implementation of learner-centred pedagogy (LCP) in low- and middle-income countries. Considerable time, money, and resources have been invested in LCP in many countries worldwide, and yet we still lack a comprehensive body of evidence regarding its implementation and outcomes. This systematic review aimed at going beyond the limitations of individual studies, confined by time, context and samples, in order to offer stronger applicability and generalisability to wider contexts. The dataset for analysis consisted of 94 journal articles published between January 2001 and December 2020, selected based on explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria. A team of three researchers utilised EPPI-Reviewer and QSR NVivo to import, screen, and analyse the texts. The literature on LCP implementation was mapped by key variables such as country, educational setting, study participants, and methods. Firstly, the study found that despite LCP being explicitly promoted in numerous contexts, most classrooms were still predominately teacher-centred. Secondly, the review identified a wide range of constraints and enablers of LCP implementation, spanning across the individual, classroom, school, policy, and wider society levels. Thirdly, although several positive and negative outcomes of LCP emerged from the study, the review found that the objective evidence on LCP outcomes was somewhat limited, indicating that there is an urgent need for additional research to evaluate LCP outcomes. A conceptual framework of LCP implementation is presented, and implications for policy and future research are discussed.

Funding

Bath Spa University

Hiroshima University

JP 20K22241

Japan Society for Promotion of Sciences (JSPS KAKENHI)

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2022 British Educational Research Association.

Notes

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request

Journal

Review of Education

Publisher

Wiley / British Educational Research Association

Version

  • Accepted Manuscript

Language

en

FCD date

2022-09-14T14:27:20Z

FOA date

2024-03-13T00:00:00Z

Citation

Vol. 10, No. 3, article e3365

Department

  • School of Education

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC