University of Exeter
Browse

Beyond proximity: A review and framework to further understanding of greenspace accessibility in the x-minute city

Download (1.29 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-19, 11:32 authored by A Schendl, JM Bullock, R Menezes, S Willcock
Urban greenspaces are crucial for public health, climate resilience, and community well-being, yet there are inequalities in accessibility in cities across the world. The 'x-minute city' framework has been proposed as a potential solution, proposing that essential services and amenities—including greenspace—should be accessible within a short commute from every residence. However, current approaches to measuring and implementing this framework often rely on single dimensional metrics that fail to capture the full complexity of how people actually access and use urban greenspaces. This review synthesises methods from three distinct fields to develop a more comprehensive understanding of greenspace accessibility: geographic information science (GIScience), which provides spatial analytical tools; behavioural ecology, which offers frameworks for understanding movement decisions; and human mobility analysis, which reveals movement patterns through the urban environment. While GIScience approaches allow for the identification of spatial inequalities in greenspace distribution, they often overlook the behavioural and social factors that influence actual usage, highlighted in behavioural ecology approaches. Similarly, human mobility models can track movement patterns but may miss environmental and cultural factors. To bridge the gap between these methods, we introduce the Multi-context Inclusive City (MIC) framework, which integrates spatial, behavioural, and mobility perspectives to analyse greenspace accessibility. This framework moves beyond proximity measures to incorporate diverse experiences, movement pathways, and the environmental and social factors that influence greenspace usage. The MIC framework offers practical guidance for selecting appropriate models and methods based on specific research questions or planning objectives. By providing a more nuanced understanding of how people interact with urban greenspaces, this framework can help planners and policymakers develop more effective strategies for creating equitable, accessible, and sustainable cities.

Funding

06895

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)

NE/S007423/1

NE/W005050/1

Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2025 The Author(s). People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Rights Retention Status

  • No

Submission date

2025-02-01

Notes

Data availability statement: This article does not include any data. This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this record

Journal

People and Nature

Publisher

Wiley / British Ecological Society

Version

  • Version of Record

Language

en

FCD date

2025-05-28T12:35:16Z

FOA date

2025-06-26T11:48:59Z

Citation

Published online 18 June 2025

Department

  • Computer Science

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC