University of Exeter
Browse

Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite-host system.

Download (497.27 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-01, 17:04 authored by T Dixit, GPT Choi, S Al-Mosleh, J Lund, J Troscianko, C Moya, L Mahadevan, CN Spottiswoode
The persistence of imperfect mimicry in nature presents a challenge to mimicry theory. Some hypotheses for the existence of imperfect mimicry make differing predictions depending on how mimetic fidelity is measured. Here, we measure mimetic fidelity in a brood parasite-host system using both trait-based and response-based measures of mimetic fidelity. Cuckoo finches Anomalospiza imberbis lay imperfectly mimetic eggs that lack the fine scribbling characteristic of eggs of the tawny-flanked prinia Prinia subflava, a common host species. A trait-based discriminant analysis based on Minkowski functionals-that use geometric and topological morphometric methods related to egg pattern shape and coverage-reflects this consistent difference between host and parasite eggs. These methods could be applied to quantify other phenotypes including stripes and waved patterns. Furthermore, by painting scribbles onto cuckoo finch eggs and testing their rate of rejection compared to control eggs (i.e. a response-based approach to quantify mimetic fidelity), we show that prinias do not discriminate between eggs based on the absence of scribbles. Overall, our results support relaxed selection on cuckoo finches to mimic scribbles, since prinias do not respond differently to eggs with and without scribbles, despite the existence of this consistent trait difference.

Funding

BB/J014109/1

Balfour studentship (University of Cambridge)

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

DMS-2002103

DST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town

National Science Foundation

Rosemary Grant Advanced Award (Society for the Study of Evolution)

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2023 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

Notes

This is the final version. Available from the Royal Society via the DOI in this record. Data accessibility: Data, R code, and a description of the dataset associated with this manuscript are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.63xsj3v60. Supplementary methods and results are provided in the electronic supplementary material.

Journal

Biology Letters

Pagination

20220538-

Publisher

The Royal Society

Place published

England

Version

  • Version of Record

Language

en

FCD date

2023-06-16T14:55:52Z

FOA date

2023-06-16T14:58:59Z

Citation

Vol. 19, No. 2, article 20220538

Department

  • Ecology and Conservation

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC