University of Exeter
Browse

Constraint and divergence in the evolution of male and female recombination rates in fishes

Download (1.05 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-01, 13:06 authored by CR Cooney, JE Mank, AE Wright
Recombination is a fundamental feature of sexual reproduction across eukaryotes, yet recombination rates are highly variable both within and between species. In particular, sex differences in recombination rate between males and females (heterochiasmy) is more often the rule than the exception, but despite its prevalence the ultimate causes of global patterns of heterochiasmy remain unclear. Here, we assemble a comprehensive dataset of sex-specific recombination rate estimates for 61 fish species, and combine this with information on sex determination, fertilisation mode and sexual dimorphism to test competing theories for the causes and evolution of heterochiasmy. We find that sex differences in recombination rate are evolutionary labile, with frequent shifts in the direction and magnitude of heterochiasmy. This rapid turnover does not appear to be driven by simple neutral processes and is inconsistent with non-adaptive explanations for heterochiasmy, including biological sex differences in meiosis. However, while patterns of heterochiasmy across the phylogeny indicate a potential role for adaptive processes, we are unable to directly link variation in heterochiasmy with proxies for sexual selection or sexual conflict across species, indicating that these effects – if present – are either subtle or complex. Finally, we show evidence for correlated rates of recombination rate evolution between males and females, indicating the potential for genetic constraints and sexual conflict over the recombination landscape.

Funding

680951

Canada 150 Research Chair

European Commission

European Research Council

NE/N013948/1

NE/T01105X/1

Natural Environment Research Council

History

Related Materials

Rights

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Notes

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.

Journal

Evolution

Publisher

Wiley

Version

  • Accepted Manuscript

Language

en

FCD date

2021-09-21T08:15:30Z

FOA date

2021-09-21T13:42:14Z

Citation

Published online 17 September 2021

Department

  • Archive

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC