University of Exeter
Browse

Cost-effectiveness of single- versus multiple-inhaler triple therapy in a UK COPD population: The INTREPID trial

Download (470.27 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-01, 17:05 authored by DMG Halpin, R Kendall, S Shukla, A Martin, D Shah, D Midwinter, KM Beeh, JWH Kocks, PW Jones, C Compton, NA Risebrough, AS Ismaila
PURPOSE: The 24-week INTREPID trial demonstrated the clinical benefits of once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus non-ELLIPTA multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) in patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of FF/UMEC/VI versus non-ELLIPTA MITT for the treatment of symptomatic COPD from a United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) perspective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analysis was conducted using the validated GALAXY COPD disease progression model. Baseline characteristics, treatment effect parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 second and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score [derived from exploratory COPD Assessment Test score mapping]), and discontinuation data from INTREPID were used to populate the model. UK healthcare resource and drug costs (2020 British pounds) were applied, and costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5%. Analyses were conducted over a lifetime horizon from a UK NHS perspective. Model outputs included exacerbation rates, total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results by varying parameter values and assumptions. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, FF/UMEC/VI provided an additional 0.174 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.024, 0.344) LYs (approximately 2 months), and 0.253 (95% CI: 0.167, 0.346) QALYs (approximately 3 months), at a cost saving of £1764 (95% CI: -£2600, -£678) per patient, compared with non-ELLIPTA MITT. FF/UMEC/VI remained the dominant treatment option, meaning greater benefits at lower costs, across all scenario and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Based on this analysis, in a UK setting, FF/UMEC/VI would improve health outcomes and reduce costs compared with non-ELLIPTA MITT for the treatment of patients with symptomatic COPD. SITT may help to reduce the clinical and economic burden of COPD and should be considered by physicians as a preferred treatment option.

Funding

212888

GlaxoSmithKlein

NCT03467425

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2022 Halpin et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

Notes

This is the final version. Available from Dove Press via the DOI in this record. Data Sharing Statement: Anonymized individual participant data and study documents for the INTREPID trial can be requested for further research from www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

Journal

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Pagination

2745-2755

Publisher

Dove Press

Place published

New Zealand

Version

  • Version of Record

Language

en

FCD date

2023-06-20T14:19:46Z

FOA date

2023-06-20T14:24:14Z

Citation

Vol. 17, pp. 2745-2755

Department

  • Clinical and Biomedical Sciences

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC