University of Exeter
Browse

Costs and benefits of social relationships in the collective motion of bird flocks

journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-01, 00:31 authored by H Ling, GE McIvor, K van der Vaart, RT Vaughan, A Thornton, NT Ouellette
Current understanding of collective behaviour in nature is based largely on models that assume that identical agents obey the same interaction rules, but in reality interactions may be influenced by social relationships among group members. Here, we show that social relationships transform local interactions and collective dynamics. We tracked individuals’ three-dimensional trajectories within flocks of jackdaws, a species that forms lifelong pair-bonds. Reflecting this social system, we find that flocks contain internal sub-structure, with discrete pairs of individuals tied together by spring-like effective forces. Within flocks, paired birds interacted with fewer neighbours than unpaired birds and flapped their wings more slowly, which may result in energy savings. However, flocks with more paired birds had shorter correlation lengths, which is likely to inhibit efficient information transfer through the flock. Similar changes to group properties emerge naturally from a generic self-propelled particle model. These results reveal a critical tension between individual- and group-level benefits during collective behaviour in species with differentiated social relationships, and have major evolutionary and cognitive implications.

Funding

Human Frontiers in Science Programme

RGP0049/2017

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2019 Springer Nature Publishing AG

Notes

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Nature Research via the DOI in this record. Supplementary Figs. 1–12 and Supplementary Tables 1–3 are available in the Supplementary Information. Raw images captured by one of the four cameras and the reconstructed birds’ 3D movement trajectories are provided in Supplementary Videos 1–6. Plain text files, each including bird ID number, position, time, velocity, acceleration and wingbeat frequency at every time step, are provided in Supplementary Data 1–7. A plain text file that includes mean wingbeat frequency, flight speed and local density (approximated by the number of neighbours within a distance of 5 m from the focal bird) for paired and unpaired birds in six flocks, as well as for birds flying alone, is provided in Supplementary Data 8. All data required to reproduce the results in this study are included in Supplementary Data 1–8. Supplementary Data and Supplementary Videos are available at https://figshare.com/s/c55eb82bab800571d25d.

Journal

Nature Ecology and Evolution

Publisher

Nature Research

Version

  • Accepted Manuscript

Language

en

FCD date

2019-05-10T11:13:13Z

FOA date

2019-11-06T00:00:00Z

Citation

Published online 6 May 2019

Department

  • Archive

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC