This article examines the relation between counting, counts and accountability. It
does so by comparing the responses of the British government to deaths associated with
Covid-19 in 2020 to its responses to deaths associated with the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Similarities and dissimilarities between the cases regarding what counted as data, what data
were taken to count, what data counted for, and how data were counted provide the basis for
considering how the bounds of democratic accountability are constituted. Based on these two
cases, the article sets out the metaphors of leaks and cascades as ways of characterising the
data practices whereby counts, counting and accountability were configured. By situating
deaths associated with Covid-19 against previous experience with deaths from war, the article
also proposes how claims to truth and ignorance might figure in any future official inquiry into
the handling of the pandemic.