University of Exeter
Browse

Evaluating Genotype-Treatment Interactions for High-Risk Medications in British General Practice: Evidence from UK Biobank

Download (799.99 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-19, 11:35 authored by K Mokbel, M Weedon, R Daniels, V Moye, L Jackson
Background: Pharmacogenetics has the potential to optimise drug therapy and reduce adverse drug effects (ADEs) by tailoring treatment to a patient's genotype, particularly for chronic disorders managed in general practice (GP). However, the adoption of pharmacogenetics in GP remains slow. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of previously reported associations between genomic variants and medically important adverse drug effects (MIADEs) associated with high-risk medications in GP. Design and setting: A retrospective study using data from the UK Biobank (UKBB), a population-based cohort of over 500,000 community-based participants. Method: We identified high-risk medications prescribed in GP by linking serious ADEs from the Yellow Card database with English GP prescription data. These high-risk medications were then cross-examined with genomic variants associated with MIADEs from the Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB), to select variant-drug pairs for investigation within the UKBB. Results: From 78 high-risk medications prescribed in GP and 56 PharmGKB annotations linked to MIADE risk, SLCO1B1 rs4149056 was the only variant with guideline-based prescribing recommendations. This variant, along with others of lower evidence levels, was analysed in the UKBB. No genotype-treatment interaction was observed for SLCO1B1 rs4149056 and statin-related muscle toxicity. Similarly, no interactions were detected for the remaining variants in either secondary or exploratory analyses. Conclusion: No statistically significant genotype-treatment interactions were observed for MIADE risk associated with high-risk medications in GP. However, the limited predictive value of the assessed variants may reflect underlying phenotypic imprecision and methodological limitations. Hence, further research is needed to validate these results.

Funding

University of Exeter

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2025 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Published by British Journal of General Practice.

Rights Retention Status

  • Yes

Submission date

2024-12-17

Notes

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the Royal College of General Practitioners via the DOI in this record Data availability statement: Data related to the Yellow Card system, English general practice prescriptions and PharmGKB, as discussed in this manuscript, are freely available and can be accessed on their respective websites by those interested in using them for non-commercial purposes. The genetic and phenotypic data from the UK Biobank can be accessed by applying through their website (www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/register-apply). We cannot directly grant access to the specific data fields used in this study. All other data relevant to the study are included in the article.

Journal

British Journal of General Practice

Pagination

BJGP.2024.0806-BJGP.2024.0806

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Version

  • Accepted Manuscript

Language

en

FCD date

2025-06-09T09:38:45Z

FOA date

2025-06-09T09:40:48Z

Citation

Published online 5 June 2025

Department

  • Health and Care Professions

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC