University of Exeter
Browse

Geoengineering tensions

Download (879.41 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-07-31, 23:33 authored by A Currie
There has been much discussion of the moral, legal and prudential implications of geoengineering, and of governance structures for both the research and deployment of such technologies. However, insufficient attention has been paid to how such measures might affect geoengineering in terms of the incentive structures which underwrite scientific progress. There is a tension between the features that make science productive, and the need to govern geoengineering research, which has thus far gone underappreciated. I emphasize how geoengineering research requires governance which reaches beyond science’s traditional boundaries, and moreover requires knowledge which itself reaches beyond what we traditionally expect scientists to know about. How we govern emerging technologies should be sensitive to the incentive structures which drive science.

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2018. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Notes

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record

Journal

Futures

Publisher

Elsevier

Version

  • Accepted Manuscript

Language

en

FCD date

2019-02-05T15:18:15Z

Citation

Vol. 102, pp. 78-88

Department

  • Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy, and Anthropology

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC