University of Exeter
Browse

Limited historical admixture between European wildcats and domestic cats

Download (3.32 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-02, 11:22 authored by A Jamieson, A Carmagnini, J Howard-McCombe, S Doherty, A Hirons, E Dimopoulos, AT Lin, R Allen, H Anderson-Whymark, R Barnett, C Batey, F Beglane, W Bowden, J Bratten, B De Cupere, E Drew, NM Foley, T Fowler, A Fox, E-M Geigl, AB Gotfredsen, T Grange, D Griffiths, D Groß, A Haruda, J Hjermind, Z Knapp, O Lebrasseur, P Librado, LA Lyons, I Mainland, C McDonnell, V Muñoz-Fuentes, C Nowak, T O'Connor, J Peters, I-RM Russo, H Ryan, A Sheridan, M-HS Sinding, P Skoglund, P Swali, R Symmons, G Thomas, TZ Trolle Jensen, AC Kitchener, H Senn, D Lawson, C Driscoll, WJ Murphy, M Beaumont, C Ottoni, N Sykes, G Larson, L Frantz
Domestic cats were derived from the Near Eastern wildcat (Felis lybica), after which they dispersed with people into Europe. As they did so, it is possible that they interbred with the indigenous population of European wildcats (Felis silvestris). Gene flow between incoming domestic animals and closely related indigenous wild species has been previously demonstrated in other taxa, including pigs, sheep, goats, bees, chickens, and cattle. In the case of cats, a lack of nuclear, genome-wide data, particularly from Near Eastern wildcats, has made it difficult to either detect or quantify this possibility. To address these issues, we generated 75 ancient mitochondrial genomes, 14 ancient nuclear genomes, and 31 modern nuclear genomes from European and Near Eastern wildcats. Our results demonstrate that despite cohabitating for at least 2,000 years on the European mainland and in Britain, most modern domestic cats possessed less than 10% of their ancestry from European wildcats, and ancient European wildcats possessed little to no ancestry from domestic cats. The antiquity and strength of this reproductive isolation between introduced domestic cats and local wildcats was likely the result of behavioral and ecological differences. Intriguingly, this long-lasting reproductive isolation is currently being eroded in parts of the species' distribution as a result of anthropogenic activities.

Funding

210119/Z/18/Z

57552336

CNRS

DEB-1753760

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst

ERC-2013-StG-337574-UNDEAD

ERC-2019-StG-853272-PALAEOFARM

European Research Council (ERC)

George Burch Postdoctoral Fellowship

NE/K003259/1

NE/K005243/1

NE/L002612/1

NE/S00078X/1

NE/S007067/1

National Science Foundation

Natural Environment Research Council grant (NERC)

University Paul Sabatier

Wellcome Trust

History

Rights

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Notes

This is the final version. Available on open access from Cell Press via the DOI in this record Data and code availability: The sequence reported in this paper is available at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB57412 under the accession number ENA: PRJEB57412.

Journal

Current Biology

Pagination

4751-4760.e14

Publisher

Cell Press

Place published

England

Version

  • Version of Record

Language

en

FCD date

2024-01-10T16:21:14Z

FOA date

2024-01-10T16:27:32Z

Citation

Vol. 33(21), pp. 4751-4760.e14

Department

  • Archaeology and History

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC