University of Exeter
Browse

Losing Face

Download (963.57 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-07-31, 23:02 authored by T Gall, D Reinstein
When Al makes an offer to Betty that Betty observes and rejects, Al may suffer a painful and costly “loss of face” (LoF). LoF can be avoided by letting the vulnerable side move second, or by setting up “Conditionally Anonymous Environments” that only reveal when both parties say yes. This can impact bilateral matching problems, e.g., marriage markets, research partnering, and international negotiations. We model this assuming asymmetric information, continuous signals of individuals’ binary types, linear marriage production functions, and a primitive LoF term component to utility. LoF makes rejecting one’s match strictly preferred to being rejected, making the “high types always reject” equilibrium stable. LoF may have non-monotonic effects on stable interior equilibria. A small LoF makes high types more selective, making marriage less common and more assortative. A greater LoF (for males only) makes low-type-males reverse snobs, which makes high-females less choosy, with ambiguous effects on the marriage rate.

History

Rights

© Oxford University Press 2019. All rights reserved.

Notes

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this record. There is another ORE record for this item in ORE at 10871/20734 There is another ORE record for this item in ORE at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/20734

Journal

Oxford Economic Papers

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Version

  • Accepted Manuscript

Language

en

FCD date

2018-12-05T11:13:24Z

Citation

Published online 15 March 2019.

Department

  • Economics

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC