University of Exeter
Browse

Monitoring Neonicotinoid Exposure for Bees in Rural and Peri-urban Areas of the U.K. during the Transition from Pre- to Post-moratorium

journal contribution
posted on 2025-07-31, 23:58 authored by E Nicholls, C Botías, EL Rotheray, P Whitehorn, A David, R Fowler, T David, H Feltham, JL Swain, P Wells, EM Hill, JL Osborne, D Goulson
Concerns regarding the impact of neonicotinoid exposure on bee populations recently led to an EU-wide moratorium on the use of certain neonicotinoids on flowering crops. Currently, evidence regarding the impact, if any, the moratorium has had on bees' exposure is limited. We sampled pollen and nectar from bumblebee colonies in rural and peri-urban habitats in three U.K. regions: Stirlingshire, Hertfordshire, and Sussex. Colonies were sampled over three years: prior to the ban (2013), during the initial implementation when some seed-treated winter-sown oilseed rape was still grown (2014), and following the ban (2015). To compare species-level differences, in 2014 only, honeybee colonies in rural habitats were also sampled. Over half of all samples were found to be contaminated (n = 408), with thiamethoxam being the compound detected at the highest concentrations in honeybee- (up to 2.29 ng/g in nectar in 2014, median ≤ 0.1 ng/g, n = 79) and bumblebee-collected pollen and nectar (up to 38.77 ng/g in pollen in 2013, median ≤ 0.12 ng/g, n = 76). Honeybees were exposed to higher concentrations of neonicotinoids than bumblebees in 2014. While neonicotinoid exposure for rural bumblebees declined post-ban (2015), suggesting a positive impact of the moratorium, the risk of neonicotinoid exposure for bumblebees in peri-urban habitats remained largely the same between 2013 and 2015.

Funding

BB/J014915/1

BB/K014498/1

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)

Defra

PS2372

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2018 American Chemical Society

Notes

This is the author accepted manuscripy. The final version is available from the American Chemical Society via the DOI in this record

Journal

Environmental Science and Technology

Publisher

American Chemical Society

Version

  • Accepted Manuscript

Language

en

FCD date

2019-07-02T09:28:32Z

FOA date

2019-07-02T09:31:02Z

Citation

Vol. 52 (16), pp. 9391 - 9402

Department

  • Archive

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC