University of Exeter
Browse

Obesity increases precision errors in total body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements

Download (333.53 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-06, 14:52 authored by KM Knapp, JR Welsman, SJ Hopkins, A Shallcross, Ignac Fogelman, Glen M. Blake
Total body (TB) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is increasingly being used to measure body composition in research and clinical settings. This study investigated the effect of body mass index (BMI) and body fat on precision errors for total and regional TB DXA measurements of bone mineral density, fat tissue, and lean tissue using the GE Lunar Prodigy (GE Healthcare, Bedford, UK). One hundred forty-four women with BMI's ranging from 18.5 to 45.9kg/m<sup>2</sup> were recruited. Participants had duplicate DXA scans of the TB with repositioning between examinations. Participants were divided into 3 groups based on their BMI, and the root mean square standard deviation and the percentage coefficient of variation were calculated for each group. The root mean square standard deviation (percentage coefficient of variation) for the normal (<25kg/m<sup>2</sup>; n=76), overweight (25-30kg/m<sup>2</sup>; n=36), and obese (>30kg/m<sup>2</sup>; n=32) BMI groups, respectively, were total BMD (g/cm<sup>2</sup>): 0.009 (0.77%), 0.009 (0.69%), 0.011 (0.91%); total fat (g): 545 (2.98%), 486 (1.72%), 677 (1.55%); total lean (g): 551 (1.42%), 540 (1.34%), and 781 (1.68%). These results suggest that serial measurements in obese subjects should be treated with caution because the least significant change may be larger than anticipated.

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2015. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Notes

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in the Journal of Clinical Densitometry. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published at doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2014.06.001.

Journal

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Publisher

Elsevier Inc.

Language

en

Citation

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2015, Vol. 18 (2), pp. 209 - 216

Department

  • Archive

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC