University of Exeter
Browse

On conveying and not conveying expertise

Download (269.71 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-06, 14:34 authored by Brian Rappert, Catelijne Coopmans
This article attends to the movement between disclosing and non-disclosing in accounts of expertise. While referencing STS discussions about tacit knowledge (‘experts know more than they can say’) and the politics of non-disclosure (withholding can help as well as harm expert credibility), in the main it considers how experts move between conveying and not conveying in order to make their proficiencies recognized and accessible to others. The article examines this movement through a form that partakes in it, thus drawing attention to conventions and tensions in how authors make themselves accountable, and their subject matter available, to audiences. It thereby proposes to explore the possibilities of careful, and generative, non-disclosure as part of expert writing practices.

History

Related Materials

Rights

© The Author(s) 2015

Notes

This is the author's accepted manuscript of an article published in Social Studies in Science, 2015, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 611-619, doi: 10.1177/0306312715595297 Word document replaced with PDF by Caroline Huxtable on 2023-09-11 Accepted

Journal

Social Studies of Science

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Language

en

FOA date

2023-09-22T02:01:17Z

Citation

Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 611-619

Department

  • Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy, and Anthropology

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC