University of Exeter
Browse

Recommendations for the Neurophysiological Assessment of Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Systematic Review of Nociceptive Blink Reflex and Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex Protocols

Download (363.53 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-10-28, 10:35 authored by Josh Murphy, Sophie Clarke, Paul Strutton, Celia Morgan, Kirsty Bannister, Sam HughesSam Hughes
<p dir="ltr">Background and Objective: The nociceptive blink reflex (NBR) and nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) are increasingly used as neurophysiological test stimuli to assess conditioned pain modulation (CPM). However, methodological inconsistencies limit reproducibility and cross‐study comparison. This systematic review aimed to evaluate experimental protocols and outcome measures used in CPM studies employing NBR or NWR, and to propose recommendations for standardisation. </p><p dir="ltr">Databases and Data Treatment: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane and Ovid databases was conducted. Studies were included if they assessed CPM in healthy adults using NBR or NWR. Data were extracted on stimulation parameters, electrode configuration, participant positioning, data acquisition, signal processing and CPM protocols. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria (6 NBR, 10 NWR). </p><p dir="ltr">Results: Across studies, stimulation protocols varied in frequency, pulse duration and threshold calibration. Electrode placements and participant positioning were often inconsistently reported. Data acquisition methods differed in sampling rates and filtering, and analysis windows were not always defined. CPM protocols included cold pressor, heat and electrocutaneous stimulation. Outcome measures included both amplitude‐ and threshold‐based metrics. </p><p dir="ltr">Conclusions: This review highlights significant methodological heterogeneity in reflex‐based CPM research in healthy participants. Standardisation of stimulation parameters, recording techniques, and CPM protocols is needed to enhance comparability and reproducibility across studies. To address this, we provide structured recommendations, based on GRADE classifications, for standardising protocols related to experimental setup, data acquisition and CPM outcome measures for both the NBR and NWR. </p><p dir="ltr">Significance Statement: Reflex‐based conditioned pain modulation demonstrates methodological inconsistencies, highlighting the need for standardised protocols. With standardised protocols recommended in this review, future efforts should focus on enhancing its reliability, reproducibility and clinical applicability.</p>

Funding

Virtually painless? Steps towards mechanism-driven use of immersive virtual reality for chronic pain.

Academy of Medical Sciences

Find out more...

Neurotechnology for Chronic Pain

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Find out more...

The PhD studentship is funded by the University of Exeter's Faculty of Health and Life Sciences.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    EISSN - Is published in 1532-2149 (European Journal of Pain)

Rights

© 2025 The Author(s). European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC ®. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Rights Retention Status

  • No

Submission date

2025-07-24

Notes

This is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.

Journal

European Journal of Pain

Volume

29

Issue

10

Article Number

e70149

Publisher

Wiley

Version

  • Version of Record

Language

en

Department

  • Clinical and Biomedical Sciences

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC