University of Exeter
Browse

Recontacting in clinical practice: the views and expectations of patients in the United Kingdom

Download (447.08 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-07-31, 18:16 authored by D Carrieri, S Dheensa, S Doheny, A Clarke, PD Turnpenny, AM Lucassen, SE Kelly
This paper explores the views and expectations of patients concerning recontacting in clinical practice. It is based on 41 semi-structured interviews conducted in the UK. The sample comprised patients or parents of patients: without a diagnosis; recently offered a test for a condition or carrier risk; with a rare condition; with a Variant of Unknown Significance (VUS) – some of whom had been recontacted. Participants were recruited both via the National Health Service (NHS) and through online, condition-specific support groups. Most respondents viewed recontacting as desirable, however there were different opinions and expectations about what type of new information should trigger recontacting. An awareness of the potential psychological impact of receiving new information led some to suggest that recontacting should be planned, and tailored to the nature of the new information and the specific situation of patients and families. The lack of clarity about lines of responsibility for recontacting and perceptions of resource constraints in the NHS tended to mitigate respondents’ favorable positions towards recontacting and their preferences. Some respondents argued that recontacting could have a preventative value and reduce the cost of healthcare. Others challenged the idea that resources should be used to implement formalized recontacting systems – via arguments that there are ‘more pressing’ public health priorities, and for the need for healthcare services to offer care to new patients.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)

History

Related Materials

Rights

© The Author(s) 2017. Open access. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Notes

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available on open access from Springer Nature via the DOI in this record.

Journal

European Journal of Human Genetics

Publisher

Springer Nature for European Society of Human Genetics

Language

en

FOA date

2024-03-23T19:02:26Z

Citation

Vol. 25, pp. 1106–1112

Department

  • Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy, and Anthropology

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC