University of Exeter
Browse

Self-directed interventions to promote weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Download (364.8 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-07-31, 14:59 authored by JC Tang, C Abraham, CJ Greaves, V Nikolaou
Many self-directed weight-loss interventions have been developed using a variety of delivery formats (e.g. internet, smartphone) and change techniques. Yet, little research has examined whether self-directed interventions can exclusively promote weight loss. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed for randomised controlled trials evaluating self-directed interventions in relation to weight loss outcomes in adults. Standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. Twenty-seven trials incorporating 36 comparisons met our inclusion criteria. Participants using self-directed interventions lost significantly more weight (MD = -1.56 kg, CI -2.25, -0.86 ranging from 0.6 to 5.3 kg) compared to those in the minimal-intervention or no-treatment groups (3.1-month follow-up median). The majority of interventions were internet-based (18 evaluations) and these were effective at 3 months (MD = -1.74 kg, CI -2.65, -0.82 ranging from 0.6 to 4.8 kg) (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI -0.72, -0.24, I² = 82%; p < .0001; 16 evaluations) and 6 months follow-up (MD = -2.71 kg, CI -4.03, -1.39 ranging from 2.2 to 5.3 kg) (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI -0.99, -0.19, I² = 76%; p = .004; 4 evaluations). Self-directed weight-loss interventions can generate modest weight loss for up to 6 months but may need to be supplemented by other interventions to achieve sustained and clinically meaningful weight loss.

Funding

The work was partially funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care of the South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC) and partly by the NIHR Career Development Fellowship CDF-2012-05-029.

History

Related Materials

Notes

Accepted author version posted online: 19 Apr 2016 Published online: 10 May 2016 This is the author accepted manuscript. Final version available from the publisher via the DOI in this record, on publication

Journal

Health Psychology Review

Publisher

Taylor & Francis (Routledge)

Language

en

Citation

DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1172979

Department

  • Archive

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC