University of Exeter
Browse

Technical change and the demand for talent

Download (591.48 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-01, 14:48 authored by J Caunedo, E Keller
Technical change shifts the relative importance of certain economic activities over others, effectively determining the incidence of barriers to the transition of workers across occupations on output and inequality. To what extent has technical change mitigated or exacerbated the incidence of these barriers? To answer this question we study the link between occupation-specific labor market barriers, as measured in Hsieh et al. (2019), and capital-embodied technical change (CETC), as measured in Caunedo et al. (2021). We find that CETC mitigated the incidence of labor market barriers on output per worker by 9.1%, in the US between 1984 and 2014. A forecasting exercise over the next 10 years suggests that if the path of CETC follows the one observed during the previous 10 years, the gender wage gap should widen by 0.12p.p. per year and the race wage gap should widen by 0.07p.p. per year. The reason is that female and black workers face higher barriers in occupations where CETC rises wages the most. In addition, the model also predicts that absent mitigation policies, the skill-premium should rise at 0.24p.p. per year, twice as fast as the observed change in the last 10 years of our sample.

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2022 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Notes

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record Data availability: The dataset, for aggregated stocks at 3-digit and 1-digit occupational classification, is available for download at https://capitalbyoccupation.weebly.com

Journal

Journal of Monetary Economics

Pagination

65-88

Publisher

Elsevier

Version

  • Accepted Manuscript

Language

en

FCD date

2022-06-27T15:06:55Z

FOA date

2024-04-29T23:00:00Z

Citation

Vol. 129, pp. 65-88

Department

  • Economics

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC