University of Exeter
Browse

Traditional and New Perspectives on Youth Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Download (1.14 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-01, 11:39 authored by N Armstrong, J Welsman
Purpose This study aimed to review traditional and new perspectives in the interpretation of the development of youth cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). Methods We analyzed data from (i) the literature which for 80 yr has been traditionally based on interpretations of peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2) in ratio with body mass (BM) and (ii) recent multilevel allometric models founded on 994 (475 from girls) determinations of 10- to 16-yr-olds' peak V˙O2 with measures of age, maturity status, and morphological covariates (BM and fat-free mass), and from 10 to 13 yr, 110 peak V˙O2 determinations of maximum cardiovascular covariates (stroke volume, cardiac output, and arteriovenous oxygen difference). Results The application of ratio scaling of physiological variables requires satisfying specific statistical assumptions that are seldom met. In direct conflict with the ratio-scaled data interpretation of CRF, multilevel allometric modeling shows that with BM controlled, peak V˙O2 increases with age but the effect is smaller in girls than boys. Maturity status exerts a positive effect on peak V˙O2, in addition to those of age and BM. Changes in maximum cardiovascular covariates contribute to explaining the development of CRF, but fat-free mass (as a surrogate for active muscle mass) is the most powerful single influence. With age, maturity status, morphological covariates, and maximum cardiovascular covariates controlled, there remains an unexplained 4% to 9% sex difference in peak V˙O2. Conclusions The traditional interpretation of peak V˙O2 in ratio with BM is fallacious and leads to spurious correlations with other health-related variables. Studies of the development of CRF require analyses of sex-specific, concurrent changes in age- and maturation-driven morphological and maximum cardiovascular covariates. Multilevel allometric modeling provides a rigorous, flexible, and sensitive method of data analysis.

History

Related Materials

Rights

© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Sports Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal

Notes

This is the final version. Available on open access from Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins via the DOI in this record

Journal

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

Publisher

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins / American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)

Version

  • Version of Record

Language

en

FCD date

2021-02-22T14:49:47Z

FOA date

2021-02-22T14:53:02Z

Citation

Vol. 52 (12), pp. 2563 - 2573

Department

  • Archive

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC