University of Exeter
Browse

Within reach? Sustainable energy infrastructure financing for 'hardest to reach' communities

Download (527.39 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-12-03, 13:28 authored by Whitney Pailman, Federico CaprottiFederico Caprotti, Penlope Yaguma, Helena Hastie, Katharina Oemmelen, Innocent Miria Opio, David Sheridan
Providing energy access in ‘hard to reach’ under- or unelectrified contexts like informal settlements or remote rural regions requires rethinking how we develop and finance energy access business models. While terminologies like ‘hardest to reach’, ‘reaching the last mile’ or ‘leaving no-one behind’ have increasingly been used within energy access and broader development discourses, different country and regional contexts present unique and practical challenges for deploying electrification models in these areas. These challenges are also intrinsically linked to the viability gap, which results from a disjuncture between end-users’ ability to pay and revenues required to cover the cost of service. ‘Hard to reach’ areas can comprise geographically remote regions like rural villages or urban informal settlements where households and businesses are precluded from grid electricity and other key infrastructure services due to financial, socio-technical and socio-political barriers despite being directly ‘under the grid’. In this paper we argue that contextual grounding is needed when exploring the intricacies of delivering energy access in contexts that traditionally lack formal service provision, security of tenure and material certainty. We furthermore argue that it is necessary to critically engage with discourses that characterise geographic remoteness as ‘un-electrifiable’. Notwithstanding the increased focus on leaving no-one behind in the international agenda, more pragmatic grounding is needed to understand and draw lessons from energy access in dynamic contexts. Drawing on the authors’ current and prior experience working on research projects on off-grid energy and other infrastructures across sub-Saharan Africa, the paper compares the geographic contexts of urban informality and geographically remote contexts through six case studies from Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, South Africa, the Kingdom of Eswatini (formerly Swaziland) and Madagascar. It explores the intricacies and practicalities of providing energy access in urban informal settlements, remote rural villages or displacement settings, and provides lessons for policy and practice.<p></p>

Funding

British Academy Newton International Fellowship: NIF22\220448

British Academy: grant number UWB190088

British Academy: grant number IOCRG\100212

Newton Fund: grant number NP2020PB

Royal Society: grant number AA21\100136

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.

Rights

© 2025 Pailman, Caprotti, Yaguma, Hastie, Oemmelen, Opio and Sheridan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms

Rights Retention Status

  • Yes

Submission date

2024-11-12

Notes

This is the final version. Available on open access from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this record.

Journal

Frontiers in Energy Research

Volume

4

Article Number

1527162

Publisher

Frontiers Media

Version

  • Version of Record

Language

en

Department

  • Geography

Usage metrics

    University of Exeter

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC