posted on 2025-07-30, 16:20authored byPeter William Stanfield
The purpose of this study is to explore the assumption that classrooms are the most appropriate places for the Teaching of English as a Second or Other Language (TESOL) to adult learners in contemporary global society. It considers the success of postmodern general education curricula that systematically dissolve the boundaries between the classroom and the community and seeks to show why such a place-based approach might be particularly useful in transforming TESOL curricula which for the most part overlook informal learning. This study offers 15 successful non-mother tongue English users the opportunity to reflect on their language learning in two separate open-ended interviews. Subsequently, it analyses the range and properties of the places of their acquisition as they emerge from the interview data. The study finds that the classroom is an insufficient place because its social relations necessarily limit learner agency and generally render it ineffective for ESOL acquisition. This suggests the need to transform TESOL into a practice from within which quite new places of learning with more equal social relations emerge where English language can be effectively acquired. This study recommends that English language learners and teachers collaboratively negotiate opportunities for participation in real-world English speaking communities of practice in order to acquire language rapidly and thoroughly. It suggests that this might be achieved by transforming tertiary level English classrooms into laboratories for critical reflection where students are encouraged to discuss problems of significance to them and subsequently deliver real world solutions to the local community. This exploration of place-based TESOL employs Critical Discourse Analysis as its methodology and is situated within the critical paradigm of language education research.
Funding
The University of Exeter
History
Notes
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
Foucault, M. (2002). The archaeology of knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method. New York: Continuum.
Gruenewald, D. A. & Smith, G. A. (2008). Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: CUP.
Osberg, D. & Biesta, G. (2008). The emergent curriculum: navigating a complex course between unguided learning and planned enculturation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 40, No. 3; 313-328. Abingdon: Routledge.
Umphrey, M. L. (2007). The power of community-centered education: Teaching as a craft of place. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education.