Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkákala, J
dc.contributor.authorBruggeman, J
dc.contributor.authorBrewin, RJW
dc.contributor.authorFord, DA
dc.contributor.authorCiavatta, S
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-16T13:50:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-10
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding ecosystem state on the North‐West European (NWE) Shelf is of major importance for both economy and climate research. The purpose of this work is to advance our modelling of in‐water optics on the NWE Shelf, with important implications for how we model primary productivity, as well as for assimilation of water‐leaving radiances. We implement a stand‐alone bio‐optical module into the existing coupled physical‐\‐biogeo\‐chemical model configuration. The advantage of the bio‐optical module, when compared to the pre‐existing light scheme is that it resolves the underwater light spectrally and distinguishes between direct and diffuse downwelling streams. The changed underwater light compares better with both satellite and in‐situ observations. The module lowered the underwater Photosynthetically Active Radiation, decreasing the simulated primary productivity, but overall the improved underwater light had relatively limited impact on the phytoplankton seasonal dynamics. We showed that the model skill in representing phytoplankton seasonal cycle (e.g phytoplankton bloom) can be substantially improved either by assimilation of satellite Phytoplankton Functional Type (PFT) chlorophyll, or by assimilating a novel PFT absorption product. Assimilation of the two PFT products yields similar results, with an important difference in the PFT community structure. Both assimilative runs lead to lower plankton biomass and increase the nutrient concentrations. We discuss some future directions on how to improve our model skill in biogeochemistry without using assimilation, e.g. by improving nutrient forcing, re‐tuning the model parameters and using the bio‐optical module to provide a two‐way physical‐biogeochemical coupling, improving the consistency between model physical and biogeochemical components.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 125 (7), article e2020JC016122en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2020jc016122
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/R006849/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/K001876/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/121478
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU) / Wileyen_GB
dc.rights©2020. Crown copyright. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectbio‐optical moduleen_GB
dc.subjectecosystem dynamicsen_GB
dc.subjectassimilation of radiancesen_GB
dc.subjectNorth‐West European Shelf biogeochemistryen_GB
dc.titleImproved representation of underwater light field and its impact on ecosystem dynamics: a study in the North Seaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-06-16T13:50:31Z
dc.identifier.issn2169-9275
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The ERA-5 atmospheric data used to force the bio-optical module can be freely downloaded from https://www.ecmwf.int/, the MODIS data for aerosol optical thickness from https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod, the NSBC climatological data-set used for model validation can be downladed from https://icdc.- cen.uni-hamburg.de/1/daten/ocean/knsc-hydrographic0/ and the ICES data from https://- www.ices.dk/marine-data/. The L4 validation data can be obtained from the Western Channel Observatory (https://www.westernchannelobservatory.org.uk/). The outputs for the NEMO-FABM-ERSEM simulations are stored on the MONSooN storage facility MASS and can be obtained upon request.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceansen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-06-08
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-06-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-06-16T13:46:23Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-08-06T14:49:05Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

©2020. Crown copyright. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as ©2020. Crown copyright. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.