Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, HSR
dc.contributor.authorMoore, IS
dc.contributor.authorKing, E
dc.contributor.authorStiles, VH
dc.contributor.authorLaudani, L
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy-Ryan, M
dc.contributor.authorMcFadden, C
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, KAJ
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T13:53:42Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-19
dc.date.updated2021-12-08T17:10:40Z
dc.description.abstractThere are currently a multitude of tests used to assess readiness to return to sport (RTS) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The aim of this study was to establish the extent to which movement strategies transfer between three common assessment tasks to help improve design of athlete testing batteries following ACLR. A cohort of 127 male patients 8-10 months post-ACLR and 45 non-injured controls took part in the study. Three movement tasks were completed (unilateral and bilateral drop jump, and 90° pre-planned cut), while ground reaction forces and three-dimensional kinematics (250 Hz) were recorded. Compared to the bilateral drop jump and cut, the unilateral drop jump had a higher proportion of work done at the ankle (d = 0.29, p < 0.001 and d = -1.87, p < 0.001, respectively), and a lower proportion of work done at the knee during the braking phase of the task (d = 0.447, p < 0.001 and d = 1.56, p < 0.001, respectively). The ACLR group had higher peak hip moments than the non-injured controls, although the proportion of work done at the ankle, knee and hip joints were similar. Movement strategies were moderately and positively related at the ankle (rs  = 0.728, p < 0.001), knee (rs  = 0.638, p < 0.001) and hip (rs  = 0.593, p < 0.001) between the unilateral and bilateral drop jump, but there was no relationship at the ankle (rs  = 0.10, p = 0.104), knee (rs  = 0.106, p = 0.166) and hip (rs  = -0.019, p = 0.808) between the unilateral drop jump and the cut. Clinicians could therefore consider omitting one of the drop jumps from assessment batteries but should include both jumping and cutting tasks.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSports Surgery Clinic, Irelanden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipKnowledge Economy Skills Scholarships 2 (KESS2)en_GB
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 19 November 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14104
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128116
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-1107-6484 (Stiles, Victoria H)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34797936en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 19 November 2022 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_GB
dc.subjectACLen_GB
dc.subjectRTSen_GB
dc.subjectmechanical worken_GB
dc.subjectmovement strategiesen_GB
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_GB
dc.titleMovement strategy correspondence across jumping and cutting tasks after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-12-13T13:53:42Z
dc.identifier.issn0905-7188
exeter.place-of-publicationDenmark
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Research data are not shared.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0838
dc.identifier.journalScandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sportsen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofScand J Med Sci Sports
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-11-17
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-11-19
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-12-09T11:05:06Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2021-11-25


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record