Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStoeckel, F
dc.contributor.authorCarter, C
dc.contributor.authorLyons, BA
dc.contributor.authorReifler, J
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-11T08:40:40Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-06
dc.date.updated2022-04-08T19:29:00Z
dc.description.abstractBackground. Vaccine hesitancy threatens public health. Some evidence suggests vaccine hesitancy in Europe may be linked with the success of populist parties, but more systematic analysis is needed. Methods. We examine the prevalence of individual level vaccine hesitancy across the EU and its association with political orientations. We also analyse whether success of populist parties is linked with vaccine hesitancy and uptake. We draw on individual-level Eurobarometer data from 2019, with a total of 27,524 respondents across the EU. We also rely on national and regional level populist party vote shares. Finally, for a timeseries analysis, we rely on aggregated populist party support as measured in the European Social Survey waves 1-9 (2002 to 2018), and national immunization coverage rates from the WHO from 2004-2018. Results. While vaccine hesitancy is confined to a minority of the population, this group is large enough to risk herd immunity. Political orientations on a left-right dimension are not strongly linked to vaccine hesitancy. Instead, vaccine hesitancy is associated with anti-elite world views and culturally closed rather than cosmopolitan positions. Conclusion. Vaccine hesitancy is not only present in all EU member states, but also maps on broader dimensions of cultural conflict. Hesitancy is rooted in a broader worldview, rather than misperceptions about health risks. Pro-vaccine interventions need to consider the underling worldview, rather than simply targeting misperceptions.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Academyen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union Horizon 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 6 May 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurpub/ckac041
dc.identifier.grantnumberSRG20\200348en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber682758en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/129337
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-8937-5962 (Stoeckel, Florian)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
dc.subjectvaccine hesitancyen_GB
dc.subjectpopulismen_GB
dc.subjectideologyen_GB
dc.subjectvaccine uptakeen_GB
dc.subjectpartiesen_GB
dc.titleThe politics of vaccine hesitancy in Europeen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-04-11T08:40:40Z
dc.identifier.issn1464-360X
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Journal of Public Healthen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-03-23
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-03-23
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-04-11T08:38:49Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-06-17T15:13:57Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com