Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStagg, BC
dc.contributor.authorDillon, J
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T13:29:36Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-21
dc.date.updated2022-10-10T12:21:43Z
dc.description.abstractSocietal Impact Statement This research attempts to provide novel insights into plant awareness disparity (plant blindness), through a systematic and critical examination of the educational and ethnobiological literature. The low interest and awareness for plants is well documented in urban societies and has serious implications for biodiversity conservation and sustainable land-use. This study is significant because it provides a comprehensive analysis of the characteristics of human-plant relations in different societies, which does not currently exist in the academic literature. The findings suggest that people's plant awareness develops where they have frequent interactions with plants that have direct relevance to their lives. Summary The inattention to plants, known as ‘plant blindness’ or ‘plant awareness disparity’, is an established concern amongst biologists, but there has been no comprehensive and critical examination of the investigative literature to date. This study aims to address this, with a narrative review of experimental studies published in indexed journals from 1998 to 2020. Data were extracted using a suite of relevant search terms, characterised using key words and subjected to a thematic content analysis; 326 studies were shortlisted for review, with the majority in the subject areas of biological education, ethnobiology and biological conservation. The prevalent research methods were interviews and free-listing exercises (ethnobiology) and questionnaires and tests (education). The most common characteristics of plant awareness disparity were a deficit of knowledge or identification skills, followed by an attention or memory advantage for animals compared to plants, preference for animals and low interest in plants. There was no concrete evidence of innate plant awareness disparity; instead, diminished experience of nature in urbanised societies appeared to be the cause. Virtually, all the 87 studies that found evidence of plant awareness disparity were undertaken in urban populations in high-income countries. By contrast, there were 109 studies of extensive botanical knowledge based on rural communities dependent on biological resources, where individual expertise was found to be proportionate to the extent of wild plant collecting. We conclude that a decline in relevant experience with plants leads to a cyclical process of inattention that could be addressed through first-hand experiences of edible and useful plants in local environments.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 21 September 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10323
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/131175
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-5154-8306 (Dillon, Justin)
dc.identifierScopusID: 7201523257 (Dillon, Justin)
dc.identifierResearcherID: AAH-5468-2021 (Dillon, Justin)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Plants, People, Planet published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of New Phytologist Foundation. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectbotanyen_GB
dc.subjecteducationen_GB
dc.subjectethnobiologyen_GB
dc.subjectnature deficiten_GB
dc.subjectpeople and plantsen_GB
dc.subjectplant awareness disparityen_GB
dc.subjectplant blindnessen_GB
dc.titlePlant awareness is linked to plant relevance: A review of educational and ethnobiological literature (1998–2020)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-10-10T13:29:36Z
dc.identifier.issn2572-2611
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: Data will be made available upon reasonable request through contacting the corresponding author.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPlants People Planeten_GB
dc.relation.ispartofPlants People Planet
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-07-21
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-09-21
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-10-10T13:27:09Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-10-10T13:29:43Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-09-21


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors. Plants, People, Planet published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of New Phytologist Foundation. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Authors. Plants, People, Planet published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of New Phytologist Foundation. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.