Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThackeray, D
dc.contributor.authorBerry Waite, L
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T10:36:19Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-14
dc.date.updated2023-10-29T09:16:57Z
dc.description.abstractThis article uses election addresses to consider how the early women parliamentary candidates sought to make their case to English voters. It then explores the insights that Mass Observation’s election surveys offer into public attitudes to women politicians, and gender and political leadership more broadly, from the late 1930s to the early 1950s. While the pioneer female candidates argued that they should have more representatives at Westminster to better uphold the ‘woman’s point of view’ this approach was gradually undermined from the 1920s onwards with the growth of programmatic politics led by Labour. Mass Observation found that voters claimed to focus more on which party had the best programme rather than the personalities of candidates. However, their findings also indicate that women candidates continued to face many additional prejudices which their male opponents did not.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipLeverhulme Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 14 November 2023en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12756
dc.identifier.grantnumberRPG-2017-176en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberRPG-2021-063en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/134380
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-8555-7080 (Thackeray, David)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Gender & History published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
dc.title‘It’s the party that counts’? The rise of Labour and the image of the woman politician at English elections, c.1929-50en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-11-01T10:36:19Z
dc.identifier.issn0953-5233
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1468-0424
dc.identifier.journalGender and Historyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofGender and History
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-10-20
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-12-18
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-10-20
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-10-29T09:17:18Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-12-06T13:00:55Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Gender & History published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and
distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Gender & History published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.