Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTownsend, KG
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-24T10:22:23Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-23
dc.date.updated2024-09-24T09:14:52Z
dc.description.abstractChildren are individuals, and they are owed rights as individuals. Here, I offer a defence of the child's right to bodily integrity against genital cutting and modification practices. The liberal commitment to the right to bodily integrity works with the harm principle as a liberty limiting commitment within a system that respects people's embodied moral personhood and their decisions about their lives and bodies. Like adults within a political system committed to the equal protection of individual rights, children must have equal rights that transcend the differences between them. But, they are different to adults in important ways, both philosophically and empirically. I offer an account of the child's right to bodily integrity that recognises them as particular embodied individuals, and prioritises their welfare interest in having their bodily integrity respected.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 23 September 2024en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/14777509241274227
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/137519
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2024. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_GB
dc.subjectChildren’s rightsen_GB
dc.subjectbodily integrityen_GB
dc.subjectinterestsen_GB
dc.subjectchild genital cutting and modification practicesen_GB
dc.titleThe child's welfare interest-based right to bodily integrityen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-09-24T10:22:23Z
dc.identifier.issn1477-7509
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current studyen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1758-101X
dc.identifier.journalClinical Ethicsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-09-23
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-09-24T10:20:39Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-09-24T10:22:49Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-09-23


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2024. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2024. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).