Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEichberger, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Simon
dc.contributor.authorKelsey, David
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-10T13:22:56Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies how updating affects ambiguity attitude. In particular we focus on generalized Bayesian updating of the Jaffray-Philippe sub-class of Choquet Expected Utility preferences. We find conditions for ambiguity attitude to be the same before and after updating. A necessary and sufficient condition for ambiguity attitude to be unchanged when updated on an arbitrary event is for the capacity to be neo-additive. We find a condition for updating on a given partition to preserve ambiguity attitude. We relate this to necessary and sufficient conditions for dynamic consistency. Finally, we study whether ambiguity increases or decreases after updating.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch supported in part by a Leverhulme Research Fellowship.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 239 - 263en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11166-012-9153-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/14989
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://link.springer.com/journal/11166en_GB
dc.subjectAmbiguityen_GB
dc.subjectGeneralized Bayesian updateen_GB
dc.subjectLearningen_GB
dc.subjectDynamic consistencyen_GB
dc.subjectChoquet expected utilityen_GB
dc.titleWhen is ambiguity-attitude constant?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2014-06-10T13:22:56Z
dc.identifier.issn0895-5646
pubs.declined2015-10-07T13:44:07.863+0100
pubs.deleted2015-10-07T13:44:07.918+0100
dc.descriptionPre-print version. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-012-9153-5en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0476
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Risk and Uncertaintyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record