Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Clare
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-25T17:16:30Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-01
dc.description.abstractThere are good reasons to test more refined measures of protest to better understand protesters’ disaffection with and disconnection from politics. This article assesses whether disaffection and disconnection predict each of: protest participation (aggregated), participation in demonstrations, and differential participation in demonstrations. Failure to vote does not predict participation in demonstrations but positively predicts participation in “protest” (aggregated). Those who demonstrate more frequently are more likely to participate in electoral politics than less frequent demonstrators. Most protesters are at least moderately engaged with formal politics, despite lacking trust in political institutions. Protest is not, therefore, a straightforward expression of anti-politics.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 3, Issue 67, pp. 574 - 588en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1065912914527798
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/15943
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSageen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://prq.sagepub.com/content/67/3.tocen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher mandateden_GB
dc.subjectanti-politicsen_GB
dc.subjectdisaffectionen_GB
dc.subjectprotesten_GB
dc.titleAnti-politics in action? Exposing measurement dilemmas in the study of unconventional political participationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.contributor.editorMazur, A
dc.contributor.editorCornell, C
dc.descriptiontypes: Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionAccepted versionen_GB
dc.identifier.journalPolitical Research Quarterlyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record