Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarvey, William S.
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-19T11:45:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-20T12:11:29Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that although the social networks of highly skilled migrants are important, British and Indian scientists in Boston tend not to use expatriate social networks. I demonstrate that wider differences in cultural norms to the indigenous population, homogeneity within a migrant group and length of time spent in the US are not the only factors that affect the participation of highly skilled migrants in expatriate social networks. Other factors such as the size of an expatriate group, the annual flow of migrants to a region as well as the propensity of expatriates to participate in indigenous social networks will also affect the extent to which they participate in these networks.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationpp. 1756 - 1765en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.06.006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16204
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16182en_GB
dc.relation.replaces10871/16182en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/geoforum/en_GB
dc.subjectHighly skilled migrantsen_GB
dc.subjectExpatriate social networksen_GB
dc.subjectBritish scientistsen_GB
dc.subjectIndian scientistsen_GB
dc.subjectBoston’s pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectoren_GB
dc.titleThe social networks of British and Indian expatriate scientists in Bostonen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-01-19T11:45:44Z
dc.date.available2015-01-20T12:11:29Z
dc.identifier.issn0016-7185
dc.descriptiontypes: Articleen_GB
dc.description“NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Geoforum. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Geoforum Volume 39, Issue 5, September 2008, Pages 1756–1765 DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.06.006”en_GB
dc.identifier.journalGeoforumen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record