Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRees, Charlotte E.
dc.contributor.authorCleland, Jennifer A.
dc.contributor.authorDennis, Ashley
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Narcie
dc.contributor.authorMattick, Karen
dc.contributor.authorMonrouxe, Lynn V.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-09T09:54:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To explore Foundation trainees' and trainers' understandings and experiences of supervised learning events (SLEs), compared with workplace-based assessments (WPBAs), and their suggestions for developing SLEs. DESIGN: A narrative interview study based on 55 individual and 19 group interviews. SETTING: UK-wide study across three sites in England, Scotland and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Using maximum-variation sampling, 70 Foundation trainees and 40 trainers were recruited, shared their understandings and experiences of SLEs/WPBAs and made recommendations for future practice. METHODS: Data were analysed using thematic and discourse analysis and narrative analysis of one exemplar personal incident narrative. RESULTS: While participants volunteered understandings of SLEs as learning and assessment, they typically volunteered understandings of WPBAs as assessment. Trainers seemed more likely to describe SLEs as assessment and a 'safety net' to protect patients than trainees. We identified 333 personal incident narratives in our data (221 SLEs; 72 WPBAs). There was perceived variability in the conduct of SLEs/WPBAs in terms of their initiation, tools used, feedback and finalisation. Numerous factors at individual, interpersonal, cultural and technological levels were thought to facilitate/hinder learning. SLE narratives were more likely to be evaluated positively than WPBA narratives overall and by trainees specifically. Participants made sense of their experiences, emotions, identities and relationships through their narratives. They provided numerous suggestions for improving SLEs at individual, interpersonal, cultural and technological levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide tentative support for the shift to formative learning with the introduction of SLEs, albeit raising concerns around trainees' and trainers' understandings about SLEs. We identify five key educational recommendations from our study. Additional research is now needed to explore further the complexities around SLEs within workplace learning.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 4, e005980en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005980
dc.identifier.otherbmjopen-2014-005980
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/19660
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25324323en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/10/e005980.fullen_GB
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjectEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)en_GB
dc.subjectMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGen_GB
dc.subjectQUALITATIVE RESEARCHen_GB
dc.subjectAdulten_GB
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen_GB
dc.subjectClinical Competenceen_GB
dc.subjectEducation, Medical, Graduateen_GB
dc.subjectEducation, Nursingen_GB
dc.subjectFaculty, Medicalen_GB
dc.subjectFaculty, Nursingen_GB
dc.subjectFeedbacken_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectGreat Britainen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectNarrationen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_GB
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_GB
dc.titleSupervised learning events in the foundation programme: a UK-wide narrative interview studyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-02-09T09:54:00Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionPublished onlineen_GB
dc.descriptionJournal Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record