Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRidd, MJ
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, DL
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, AA
dc.contributor.authorSalisbury, C
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, W
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-27T12:11:48Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Continuity of care may affect the diagnostic process in cancer but there is little research. AIM: To estimate associations between patient-doctor continuity and time to diagnosis and referral of three common cancers. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study in general practices in England. METHOD: This study used data from the General Practice Research Database for patients aged ≥40 years with a diagnosis of breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. Relevant cancer symptoms or signs were identified up to 12 months before diagnosis. Patient-doctor continuity (fraction-of-care index adjusted for number of consultations) was calculated up to 24 months before diagnosis. Time ratios (TRs) were estimated using accelerated failure time regression models. RESULTS: Patient-doctor continuity in the 24 months before diagnosis was associated with a slightly later diagnosis of colorectal (time ratio [TR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.01 to 1.02) but not breast (TR = 1.00, 0.99 to 1.01) or lung cancer (TR = 1.00, 0.99 to 1.00). Secondary analyses suggested that for colorectal and lung cancer, continuity of doctor before the index consultation was associated with a later diagnosis but continuity after the index consultation was associated with an earlier diagnosis, with no such effects for breast cancer. For all three cancers, most of the delay to diagnosis occurred after referral. CONCLUSION: Any effect for patient-doctor continuity appears to be small. Future studies should compare investigations, referrals, and diagnoses in patients with and without cancer who present with possible cancer symptoms or signs; and focus on 'difficult to diagnose' types of cancer.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by Cancer Research UK (C41384/A13266).en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 65 (634), pp. e305 - e311en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp15X684829
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/21729
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitionersen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25918335en_GB
dc.rightsThis article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 3.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectcanceren_GB
dc.subjectcontinuity of careen_GB
dc.subjectdiagnosisen_GB
dc.subjectgeneral practiceen_GB
dc.subjectpatient-doctor continuityen_GB
dc.subjectsymptomsen_GB
dc.subjectAgeden_GB
dc.subjectContinuity of Patient Careen_GB
dc.subjectDelayed Diagnosisen_GB
dc.subjectElectronic Health Recordsen_GB
dc.subjectEnglanden_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_GB
dc.subjectGeneral Practiceen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectMorbidityen_GB
dc.subjectNeoplasmsen_GB
dc.subjectPatient Acceptance of Health Careen_GB
dc.subjectPhysician-Patient Relationsen_GB
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen_GB
dc.titlePatient-doctor continuity and diagnosis of cancer: electronic medical records study in general practiceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-05-27T12:11:48Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from Royal College of General Practitioners via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of General Practiceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record