Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKulich, C
dc.contributor.authorRyan, MK
dc.contributor.authorHaslam, SA
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T13:37:32Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-17
dc.description.abstractAn archival study of U.K. General Election results from 2001, 2005, and 2010 revealed that Conservative black and minority ethnic (BME) candidates were less successful than their white counterparts. However, mediation analyses demonstrate that this lack of success can be explained by the lower winnability of BME candidates’ seats, such that the opposition candidate held a seat with a significantly larger majority compared with white candidates’ opponents. Results and implications are discussed in the framework of the “glass cliff,” previously demonstrated for women, in the sense that the seats minority groups contested were harder to win compared with majority groups.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project was supported by the European Social Fund (Ref: 4130) and by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (RES 062 23 0135).en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 67 (1), pp. 84 - 95en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1065912913495740
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/28460
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.subjectglass cliffen_GB
dc.subjectethnicityen_GB
dc.subjectgenderen_GB
dc.subjectleadershipen_GB
dc.subjectpoliticsen_GB
dc.titleThe Political Glass Cliff: Understanding How Seat Selection Contributes to the Underperformance of Ethnic Minority Candidatesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2017-07-14T13:37:32Z
dc.identifier.issn1065-9129
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPolitical Research Quarterlyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record