Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLourida, I
dc.contributor.authorAbbott, RA
dc.contributor.authorRogers, M
dc.contributor.authorLang, IA
dc.contributor.authorStein, K
dc.contributor.authorKent, B
dc.contributor.authorThompson Coon, J
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-20T11:32:04Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-14
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The need to better understand implementing evidence-informed dementia care has been recognised in multiple priority-setting partnerships. The aim of this scoping review was to give an overview of the state of the evidence on implementation and dissemination of dementia care, and create a systematic evidence map. METHODS: We sought studies that addressed dissemination and implementation strategies or described barriers and facilitators to implementation across dementia stages and care settings. Twelve databases were searched from inception to October 2015 followed by forward citation and grey literature searches. Quantitative studies with a comparative research design and qualitative studies with recognised methods of data collection were included. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers with discrepancies resolved by a third where necessary. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer and checked by a second. Strategies were mapped according to the ERIC compilation. RESULTS: Eighty-eight studies were included (30 quantitative, 34 qualitative and 24 mixed-methods studies). Approximately 60% of studies reported implementation strategies to improve practice: training and education of professionals (94%), promotion of stakeholder interrelationships (69%) and evaluative strategies (46%) were common; financial strategies were rare (15%). Nearly 70% of studies reported barriers or facilitators of care practices primarily within residential care settings. Organisational factors, including time constraints and increased workload, were recurrent barriers, whereas leadership and managerial support were often reported to promote implementation. Less is known about implementation activities in primary care and hospital settings, or the views and experiences of people with dementia and their family caregivers. CONCLUSION: This scoping review and mapping of the evidence reveals a paucity of robust evidence to inform the successful dissemination and implementation of evidence-based dementia care. Further exploration of the most appropriate methods to evaluate and report initiatives to bring about change and of the effectiveness of implementation strategies is necessary if we are to make changes in practice that improve dementia care.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis review was funded by Alzheimer’s Society UK [AS-PG-14-016] and supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC).en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 17, article 147en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12877-017-0528-y
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/29937
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28709402en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2017. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectDementia careen_GB
dc.subjectDisseminationen_GB
dc.subjectImplementationen_GB
dc.subjectScoping reviewen_GB
dc.subjectStrategiesen_GB
dc.titleDissemination and implementation research in dementia care: a systematic scoping review and evidence mapen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2017-10-20T11:32:04Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from BioMed Central via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMC Geriatricsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record