Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHooker, JN
dc.contributor.authorRuhl, M
dc.contributor.authorDickson, AJ
dc.contributor.authorHansen, LN
dc.contributor.authorIdiz, E
dc.contributor.authorHesselbo, SP
dc.contributor.authorCartwright, J
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-10T09:17:53Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-05
dc.description.abstractCores recovered from the Jurassic (Toarcian) Posidonienschiefer (Posidonia Shale) in the Lower Saxony Basin, Germany, contain calcite filled fractures (veins) at low angle to bedding. The veins preferentially form where the shale is both organic rich and thermally mature, supporting previous interpretations that the veins formed as hydraulic fractures in response to volumetric expansion of organic material during catagenesis. Despite the presence of hydrocarbons during fracturing, the calcite fill is fibrous and so the veins appear to have contained a mineral-saturated aqueous solution as they formed. The veins also contain myriad host-rock inclusions having sub-millimetric spacing. These inclusions are strands of host rock that were entrained as the veins grew by separating the host rock along bedding planes, rather than cutting across planes. The veins therefore produce significantly more surface area—by a factor of roughly five, for the size of veins observed—compared to an inclusion-free fracture of the same size. Analysis of vein geometry indicates that, with propagation, fracture surface area increases with fracture length raised to a power between 1 and 2, assuming linear aperture-length scaling. As such, this type of fracture efficiently dissipates elastic strain energy as it lengthens, stabilizing propagation and precluding dynamic crack growth. The apparent separation of the host rock along bedding planes suggests that the mechanical weakness of bedding planes is the cause of this inherently stable style of propagationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Oxforden_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 05 February 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2019jb018442
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/40786
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)en_GB
dc.rights©2020 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserveden_GB
dc.subjectFractureen_GB
dc.subjectShaleen_GB
dc.subjectPosidonienschieferen_GB
dc.subjectLower Saxony Basinen_GB
dc.subjectMudrocken_GB
dc.subjectCalciteen_GB
dc.titleShale anisotropy and natural hydraulic fracture propagation: An example from the Jurassic (Toarcian) Posidonienschiefer, Germanyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-02-10T09:17:53Z
dc.identifier.issn2169-9313
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData for this study are available at https://doi.org/10.26208/xny8-4t47.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-02-02
exeter.funder::University of Oxforden_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-02-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-02-10T09:14:36Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-02-10T09:17:56Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record