Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNewson, Lesleyen_GB
dc.contributor.authorLea, Stephen E.G.en_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeter (Stephen Lea)en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-08T13:14:46Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T12:00:46Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T14:54:57Z
dc.date.issued2000-08en_GB
dc.description.abstractWomen's preference for symmetrical men need not have evolved as part of a good gene sexual selection (GGSS) reproductive strategy employed during recent human evolutionary history. It may be a remnant of the reproductive strategy of a perhaps promiscuous species which existed prior to the divergence of the human line from that of the bonobo and chimp.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), pp. 618-619, August 2000.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/34872en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBSen_GB
dc.subjectevolutionary psychologyen_GB
dc.subjectreproductive strategyen_GB
dc.subjectsymmetry preferencesen_GB
dc.titleThe limits imposed by culture: Are symmetry preferences evidence of a recent reproductive strategy or a common primate inheritance?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2008-08-08T13:14:46Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T12:00:46Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T14:54:57Z
dc.identifier.issn0140-525Xen_GB
dc.description© Cambridge University Press 2000. Published version reproduced with the permission of the publisher.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1469-1825en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBehavioral and Brain Sciencesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record