dc.contributor.author | Newson, Lesley | en_GB |
dc.contributor.author | Lea, Stephen E.G. | en_GB |
dc.contributor.department | University of Exeter (Stephen Lea) | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-08-08T13:14:46Z | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-25T12:00:46Z | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-20T14:54:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2000-08 | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | Women's preference for symmetrical men need not have evolved as part of a good gene sexual selection (GGSS) reproductive strategy employed during recent human evolutionary history. It may be a remnant of the reproductive strategy of a perhaps promiscuous species which existed prior to the divergence of the human line from that of the bonobo and chimp. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), pp. 618-619, August 2000. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10036/34872 | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS | en_GB |
dc.subject | evolutionary psychology | en_GB |
dc.subject | reproductive strategy | en_GB |
dc.subject | symmetry preferences | en_GB |
dc.title | The limits imposed by culture: Are symmetry preferences evidence of a recent reproductive strategy or a common primate inheritance? | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2008-08-08T13:14:46Z | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2011-01-25T12:00:46Z | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2013-03-20T14:54:57Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0140-525X | en_GB |
dc.description | © Cambridge University Press 2000. Published version reproduced with the permission of the publisher. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1469-1825 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | en_GB |