Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPhoenix, Cassandraen_GB
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Bretten_GB
dc.contributor.authorSparkes, Andrew C.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorKirkby, Joannaen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T12:46:01Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T17:14:58Z
dc.date.issued2012-12en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis paper critically discusses mixed-method research. A case is first offered as to why it is relevant for physical therapists to engage with the mixing of quantitative and qualitative methods and engage in debates about the intermingling of these techniques. Next, to provide a context for critical discussion several paradigms are outlined. Following this, two positions on mixed-method research are discussed. These are a pragmatist position and a purist position. The paper closes by suggesting that physical therapy researchers consider adopting the role of a connoisseur in order to engage with the critical issues emerging in mixed-method research.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Therapy Reviews, 2012, 17 (6), pp. 374-381en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1179/1743288X12Y.0000000030en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/4101en_GB
dc.publisherManey Publishingen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_GB
dc.subjectMixed methodsen_GB
dc.subjectPragmatismen_GB
dc.subjectPlurismen_GB
dc.titleQualitative research in physical therapy: A critical discussion on mixed method research.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2013-01-03T12:46:01Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T17:14:58Z
dc.descriptionThis is a postprint of an article published in Physical Therapy Reviews, 2012, 17 (6), pp. 374-381© 2012 copyright Maney Publishing. Physical Therapy Reviews is available online at: http://maneypublishing.com/index.php/journals/ptr/en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPhysical Therapy Reviewsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record