Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDixon, John
dc.contributor.authorLevine, Mark
dc.contributor.authorReicher, Steve
dc.contributor.authorDurrheim, Kevin
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-13T13:32:58Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractFor most of the history of prejudice research, negativity has been treated as its emotional and cognitive signature, a conception that continues to dominate work on the topic. By this definition, prejudice occurs when we dislike or derogate members of other groups. Recent research, however, has highlighted the need for a more nuanced and ‘inclusive’ (Eagly 2004) perspective on the role of intergroup emotions and beliefs in sustaining discrimination. On the one hand, several independent lines of research have shown that unequal intergroup relations are often marked by attitudinal complexity, with positive responses such as affection and admiration mingling with negative responses such as contempt and resentment. Simple antipathy is the exception rather than the rule. On the other hand, there is mounting evidence that nurturing bonds of affection between the advantaged and the disadvantaged sometimes entrenches rather than disrupts wider patterns of discrimination. Notably, prejudice reduction interventions may have ironic effects on the political attitudes of the historically disadvantaged, decreasing their perceptions of injustice and willingness to engage in collective action to transform social inequalities. These developments raise a number of important questions. Has the time come to challenge the assumption that negative evaluations are inevitably the cognitive and affective hallmarks of discrimination? Is the orthodox concept of prejudice in danger of side-tracking, if not obstructing, progress towards social justice in a fuller sense? What are the prospects for reconciling a prejudice reduction model of change, designed to get people to like one another more, with a collective action model of change, designed to ignite struggles to achieve intergroup equality?en_GB
dc.identifier.citationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2012, 35 (6), pp 438-439en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0140525X11002214
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/10621
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8776179en_GB
dc.titleBeyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2013-06-13T13:32:58Z
dc.descriptionpublication-status: Accepteden_GB
dc.descriptiontypes: Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is a post print version of an article published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2012, 35 (6), pp 438-439 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001252 Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBehavioral and Brain Sciencesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record