Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAgostinete, RR
dc.contributor.authorVlachopoulos, D
dc.contributor.authorWerneck, AO
dc.contributor.authorMaillane-Vanegas, S
dc.contributor.authorLynch, KR
dc.contributor.authorNaughton, G
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, RA
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-27T09:48:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-25
dc.description.abstractSummary This study investigated the impact and non-impact sports on bone mineral density accrual in adolescents over 18 months. The impact sports were beneficial for bone health (accrual of bone density). In contrast, swimmers had similar or lower bone mineral density compared with the control group depending on the skeletal site. Purpose To investigate the impact and non-impact sports on bone mineral density (BMD) accrual in adolescents over a period of 18 months Methods The sample was composed of 71 adolescents, avarage age of 12.7 (± 1.7) years old at baseline. Bone outcomes were compared according to the loading of the sports practiced (impact sports, n = 33 [basketball, karate, and judo], non-impact sport, n = 18 [swimming], and control group, n = 20). Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) estimated through equation. The results were compared between the groups using analysis of variance and analysis of covariance. Results Adjusted aBMD at lower limbs, whole body less head (WBLH), and adjusted WBLH BMAD were significantly greater in the impact sport group than the non-impact sport group at all time points. Adjusted upper limbs aBMD was significantly higher at the impact sports group compared to the non-impact sport group at 9 months and 18 months, besides compared to the control group at baseline and 18 months. Non-impact sport group presented a significant lower adjusted aBMD compared with control group at lower limbs and WBLH at 9 months, and at 9 months and 18 months in WBLH BMAD. There was a significant interaction (time × sport group) at upper limbs (p = 0.042) and WBLH aBMD (p = 0.006), and WBLH BMAD (p < 0.001). Conclusion Impact sports were more beneficial on accumulating aBMD and BMAD over a period of 18 months, while nonimpact group (swimmers) had similar and lower aBMD and BMAD compared with the control groupen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSão Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 15:64en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11657-020-00727-2
dc.identifier.grantnumber2013/06963-5en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2015/13543-8en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2016/06920-2en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2017/09182-5en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2018/24164-6en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/120813
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 25 April 2021 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rightsInternational Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2020en_GB
dc.subjectBone developmenten_GB
dc.subjectLongitudinalen_GB
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_GB
dc.subjectSports trainingen_GB
dc.subjectBone densityen_GB
dc.titleBone accrual over 18 months of participation in different loading sports during adolescenceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-04-27T09:48:46Z
dc.identifier.issn1862-3522
exeter.article-number64en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalArchives of Osteoporosisen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-19
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-03-19
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-04-27T09:43:32Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record