Do AKT1, COMT and FAAH influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users?
dc.contributor.author | Hindocha, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Quattrone, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Freeman, TP | |
dc.contributor.author | Murray, RM | |
dc.contributor.author | Mondelli, V | |
dc.contributor.author | Breen, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Curtis, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Morgan, CJA | |
dc.contributor.author | Valerie Curran, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Di Forti, M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-03T13:31:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05-12 | |
dc.description.abstract | Epidemiological and biological evidence support the association between heavy cannabis use and psychosis. However, it is unclear which cannabis users are susceptible to its psychotogenic effect. Therefore, understanding genetic factors contributing to this relationship might prove an important strategy to identify the mechanisms underlying cannabis-associated psychotic experiences. We aimed to determine how variation in AKT1, COMT and FAAH genotypes, and their interaction with three different groups (first episode psychosis (FEP) patients (n = 143), controls (n = 92) and young adult (YA) cannabis users n = 485)) influenced cannabis experiences, in those who had used cannabis at least once. We investigated the role of AKT1 (rs2494732), COMT Val158Met (rs4680) and FAAH (rs324420) on cannabis experiences by combining data from a large case-control study of FEP patients, with a naturalistic study of YA cannabis users (n = 720). Outcome measures were cannabis-induced psychotic-like experiences (cPLEs) and euphoric experiences (cEEs). We used linear mixed effects models to assess the effects of each genotype and their interaction with group, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, age of first cannabis use, years of use and frequency. cPLEs were more frequent in FEP patients than controls and YA cannabis users. cEEs were more prevalent in YA cannabis users than FEP patients or controls. Variation in AKT1, COMT or FAAH was not associated with cPLEs/cEEs. There was no interaction between genotype and group (FEP cases, controls and YA cannabis users) on cPLEs/cEEs. In conclusion, AKT1, COMT or FAAH did not modulate specific psychotomimetic response to cannabis and did not interact with group, contrary to previous research. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Medical Research Council (MRC) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 10:143 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41398-020-0823-9 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | CRGW | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/121271 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | en_GB |
dc.rights | Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | en_GB |
dc.title | Do AKT1, COMT and FAAH influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users? | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-03T13:31:09Z | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2158-3188 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Translational Psychiatry | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-04-28 | |
exeter.funder | ::Medical Research Council (MRC) | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-05-12 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2020-06-03T13:27:00Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-06-03T13:31:16Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.