Common datastream permutations of animal social network data are not appropriate for hypothesis testing using regression models
dc.contributor.author | Weiss, MN | |
dc.contributor.author | Franks, DW | |
dc.contributor.author | Brent, LJN | |
dc.contributor.author | Ellis, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Silk, MJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Croft, DP | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-07T10:15:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-10-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | 1. Social network methods have become a key tool for describing, modelling, and testing hypotheses about the social structures of animals. However, due to the non-independence of network data and the presence of confounds, specialized statistical techniques are often needed to test hypotheses in these networks. Datastream permutations, originally developed to test the null hypothesis of random social structure, have become a popular tool for testing a wide array of null hypotheses in animal social networks. In particular, they have been used to test whether exogenous factors are related to network structure by interfacing these permutations with regression models. 2. Here, we show that these datastream permutations typically do not represent the null hypothesis of interest to researchers interfacing animal social network analysis with regression modelling, and use simulations to demonstrate the potential pitfalls of using this methodology. 3. Our simulations show that, if used to indicate whether a relationship exists between network structure and a covariate, datastream permutations can result in extremely high type I error rates, in some cases approaching 50%. In the same set of simulations, traditional node-label permutations produced appropriate type I error rates (~ 5%). 4. Our analysis shows that datastream permutations do not represent the appropriate null hypothesis for these analyses. We suggest that potential alternatives to this procedure may be found in regarding the problems of non-independence of network data and unreliability of observations separately. If biases introduced during data collection can be corrected, either prior to model fitting or within the model itself, node-label permutations then serve as a useful test for interfacing animal social network analysis with regression modelling | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | NIH | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 9 October 2020 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/2041-210X.13508 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NE/S010327/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | R01AG060931 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | R01MH118203 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/122741 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wiley / British Ecological Society | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2020 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | |
dc.subject | group living | en_GB |
dc.subject | null hypothesis significance testing | en_GB |
dc.subject | null model | en_GB |
dc.subject | permutation test | en_GB |
dc.subject | randomisations | en_GB |
dc.subject | regression | en_GB |
dc.subject | social networks | en_GB |
dc.title | Common datastream permutations of animal social network data are not appropriate for hypothesis testing using regression models | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-07T10:15:43Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2041-210X | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Methods in Ecology and Evolution | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-09-06 | |
exeter.funder | ::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-09-06 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2020-09-07T09:14:21Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-10-14T10:39:31Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.