Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKelly, C
dc.contributor.authorWynants, M
dc.contributor.authorMunishi, LK
dc.contributor.authorNasseri, M
dc.contributor.authorPatrick, A
dc.contributor.authorMtei, KM
dc.contributor.authorMkilema, F
dc.contributor.authorRabinovich, A
dc.contributor.authorGilvear, D
dc.contributor.authorWilson, G
dc.contributor.authorBlake, W
dc.contributor.authorNdakidemi, PA
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T12:40:56Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-25
dc.description.abstractAchieving change to address soil erosion has been a global yet elusive goal for decades. Efforts to implement effective solutions have often fallen short due to a lack of sustained, context-appropriate and multi-disciplinary engagement with the problem. Issues include prevalence of short-term funding for ‘quick-fix’ solutions; a lack of nuanced understandings of institutional, socio-economic or cultural drivers of erosion problems; little community engagement in design and testing solutions; and, critically, a lack of traction in integrating locally designed solutions into policy and institutional processes. This paper focusses on the latter issue of local action for policy integration, drawing on experiences from a Tanzanian context to highlight the practical and institutional disjuncts that exist; and the governance challenges that can hamper efforts to address and build resilience to soil erosion. By understanding context-specific governance processes, and joining them with realistic, locally designed actions, positive change has occurred, strengthening local-regional resilience to complex and seemingly intractable soil erosion challenges.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 9, 352en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/land9100352
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/R009309/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/123093
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherMDPIen_GB
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectbyelawsen_GB
dc.subjectgully erosionen_GB
dc.subjectland degradationen_GB
dc.subjectcommunity engagementen_GB
dc.subjectresilienceen_GB
dc.subjectpolicyen_GB
dc.subjectagro-pastoralen_GB
dc.subjectco-designen_GB
dc.subjectinterdisciplinaryen_GB
dc.subjectMaasaien_GB
dc.subjectTanzaniaen_GB
dc.title‘Mind the Gap’: Reconnecting local actions and multi-level policies to bridge the governance gap. An example of soil erosion action from East Africaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-10-05T12:40:56Z
dc.identifier.issn2073-445X
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalLanden_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-22
exeter.funder::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-09-25
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-10-05T12:39:12Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-10-05T12:41:02Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).