Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPearce, E
dc.contributor.authorBarreto, M
dc.contributor.authorVictor, C
dc.contributor.authorHammond, C
dc.contributor.authorEccles, AE
dc.contributor.authorRichins, MT
dc.contributor.authorO'Neal, A
dc.contributor.authorKnowles, ML
dc.contributor.authorQualter, P
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-16T12:15:43Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-20
dc.description.abstractPrevious experimental work showed that young adults reporting loneliness performed less well on emotion recognition tasks (Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy [DANVA2]) if they were framed as indicators of social aptitude, but not when the same tasks were framed as indexing academic aptitude. Such findings suggested that undergraduates reporting loneliness possessed the social monitoring skills necessary to read the emotions underlying others’ facial expressions, but that they choked under social pressure. It has also been found that undergraduates reporting loneliness have better recall for both positive and negative social information than their non-lonely counterparts. Whether those effects are evident across different age groups has not been examined. Using data from the BBC Loneliness Experiment that included participants ages 16-99 years (N = 54,060) we (i) test for replication in a larger worldwide sample, and (ii) extend those linear model analyses to other age groups. We found only effects for participants ages 25-34 years: In this age group, loneliness was associated with increased recall of negative individual information, and with choking under social pressure during the emotion recognition task; those effects were small. We did not find any such effects among participants in other age groups. Our findings suggest that different cognitive processes may be associated with loneliness in different age groups, highlighting the importance of life-course approaches in this area.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 20 December 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0165025420979369
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/123280
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© 2020 SAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
dc.subjectEmotion recognitionen_GB
dc.subjectSocial Cognitionsen_GB
dc.subjectLonelinessen_GB
dc.subjectSocial Skillsen_GB
dc.subjectCognitive biasen_GB
dc.titleChoking under pressure: does it get easier with age? Loneliness affects social monitoring across the lifespanen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-10-16T12:15:43Z
dc.identifier.issn0165-0254
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1464-0651
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Behavioral Developmenten_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-16
exeter.funder::Wellcome Trusten_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-10-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-10-16T11:53:14Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-01-15T15:02:02Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 SAGE Publications
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020 SAGE Publications