Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirby, TA
dc.contributor.authorMerritt, SK
dc.contributor.authorBaillie, S
dc.contributor.authorMalahy, LW
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, CR
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T10:17:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-21
dc.description.abstractBoth straight (i.e., heterosexual) and gay/lesbian individuals still question and erase bisexual identities. Skeptics contend that people adopt bisexual identities for strategic motivations, such as avoiding the stigma associated with identifying as gay, or for attention-seeking purposes. Across two studies, self-identified gay (N = 168), straight (N = 237), and bisexual (N = 231) participants completed a sexual identity Implicit Association Test, a measure that can provide insight into automatic associations and lessen the influence of impression management strategies. All three groups displayed implicit sexual identities that were consistent with their self-ascribed identities. Gay men and lesbians implicitly identified as more gay and less bisexual than bisexual men and women, who in turn identified as less straight and more bisexual than straight men and women. These findings show that self-reported sexual identities converge with implicit identities and have implications for understanding the psychology of sexual orientation.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundationen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 21 December 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1948550620980916
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/S00274X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/124243
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://osf.io/u68tv/en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://osf.io/7kfvren_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_GB
dc.subjectsexualityen_GB
dc.subjectautomatic/implicit processesen_GB
dc.subjectself/identityen_GB
dc.subjectsocial identityen_GB
dc.subjectindividual differencesen_GB
dc.subjectprejudice/stereotypingen_GB
dc.subjectself-concepten_GB
dc.subjectself-categorizationen_GB
dc.subjectsocial cognitionen_GB
dc.subjectstigmaen_GB
dc.titleCombating bisexual erasure: The correspondence of implicit and explicit sexual identityen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-12-22T10:17:27Z
dc.identifier.issn1948-5506
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The research data and materials supporting this publication are openly available from the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/u68tv/. The Study 2 preregistration is available at https://osf.io/7kfvr.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalSocial Psychological and Personality Scienceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-11-18
exeter.funder::Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-18
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-12-21T20:57:54Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-12-22T10:17:33Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).