Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLlewellyn, T
dc.contributor.authorRose, PE
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-11T12:40:11Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-11
dc.description.abstractYouTube is the dominant online video-sharing platform and offers zoos an opportunity to engage a vast audience with conservation content. As there is limited research evaluating how zoos currently utilize YouTube, we cataloged and evaluated the content of 20 zoological organizations (focusing on the top 1000 most viewed videos from each channel) from 2006 to 2019. Separately, educational content in a subsample of the most viewed and recently produced videos from three zoo-YouTube channels was catalogued and evaluated for the period 2016 to 2019. We found that channels are becoming more focused on producing entertainment, rather than education-based content and not reflecting the taxonomic diversity of their animals. Videos containing conservation content may not be the most popular with the YouTube audience (making up only 3% of the most viewed videos), but there is evidence that outputs are becoming more conservation orientated, with more conservation-focused videos being produced over time. Zoos may be engaging with large audiences via YouTube, but should carefully consider how they represent different taxonomic classes and how they can create educational material in interesting and accessible forms.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 2 (2), pp. 250 - 264en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jzbg2020017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/125636
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherMDPIen_GB
dc.rights© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectzooen_GB
dc.subjectYouTubeen_GB
dc.subjecteducationen_GB
dc.subjectconservationen_GB
dc.subjectsocial mediaen_GB
dc.titleEducation Is Entertainment? Zoo Science Communication on YouTubeen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-05-11T12:40:11Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from MDPI via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: Data is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding authoren_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2673-5636
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Zoological and Botanical Gardensen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-05-04
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-05-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-05-11T12:38:53Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-05-11T12:40:48Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).