Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuppes, A
dc.contributor.authorvan der Toorn, J
dc.contributor.authorBegeny, CT
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-02T08:08:51Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-30
dc.description.abstractRationale With a concealable stigmatized identity, sexual minorities not only face discrimination but the burden of deciding when to be open about their sexuality. What are the mental health costs and benefits to openness about sexual minority status? On the one hand, openness fosters integration within the LGBTQ + community (yielding downstream benefits), but it also heightens perceptions of discrimination towards oneself and the group at large (yielding downstream costs for mental health). Objective Previous research has focused on openness as reflecting either a cost or a benefit to sexual minorities’ mental health, resulting in apparent conflict. We propose an integrated view of openness as leading to both costs and benefits that work in tandem to steer mental health. Methods In two pre-registered studies with nearly 4000 ethnically diverse, sexual minority participants, we propose a theoretically-driven serial mediation model to test opposing mediating mechanisms of LGBTQ + identity importance, community integration, and perception of discrimination. Specifically, we determine how the relationship between openness about sexual minority status fosters LGBTQ + identity importance, community integration, and perception of discrimination. Results Being more (vs. less) open strengthens LGBTQ identity importance, facilitating integration in the LGBTQ + community, which benefits mental health. However, openness and strengthened identity importance simultaneously prompt increased perceptions of discrimination, the burden of which adversely affects mental health. Together these opposing forces explain the weak association between greater openness and mental health – an association that indicates, overall, that openness does have a net benefit for LGBTQ + individuals’ mental health. Conclusions By identifying opposing mechanisms that underlie the relationship between openness and mental health, we have provided a more integrated perspective on the role that openness plays on sexual minorities’ mental health. Openness is associated with stronger group identity importance, greater community integration, and heightened perception that the group (and self) face discrimination.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationArticle 114286en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/126629
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 30 July 2022 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dc.subjectSexual minoritiesen_GB
dc.subjectLGBTen_GB
dc.subjectMental healthen_GB
dc.subjectWellbeingen_GB
dc.subjectConcealmenten_GB
dc.subjectStigmaen_GB
dc.titleUnhealthy closets, discriminatory dwellings: The mental health benefits and costs of being open about one's sexual minority statusen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-08-02T08:08:51Z
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536
exeter.article-number114286en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalSocial Science and Medicineen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-07-29
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-07-30
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-08-02T08:04:44Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-07-29T23:00:00Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/