Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreenwald, AG
dc.contributor.authorBrendl, M
dc.contributor.authorCai, H
dc.contributor.authorCvencek, D
dc.contributor.authorDovidio, JF
dc.contributor.authorFriese, M
dc.contributor.authorHahn, A
dc.contributor.authorHehman, E
dc.contributor.authorHofmann, W
dc.contributor.authorHughes, S
dc.contributor.authorHussey, I
dc.contributor.authorJordan, C
dc.contributor.authorKirby, TA
dc.contributor.authorLai, CK
dc.contributor.authorLang, JWB
dc.contributor.authorLindgren, KP
dc.contributor.authorMaison, D
dc.contributor.authorOstafin, BD
dc.contributor.authorRae, JR
dc.contributor.authorRatliff, KA
dc.contributor.authorSpruyt, A
dc.contributor.authorWiers, RW
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-17T12:36:40Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-13
dc.description.abstractInterest in unintended discrimination that can result from implicit attitudes and stereotypes (implicit biases) has stimulated many research investigations. Much of this research has used the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to measure association strengths that are presumed to underlie implicit biases. It had been more than a decade since the last published treatment of recommended best practices for research using IAT measures. After an initial draft by the first author, and continuing through three subsequent drafts, the 22 authors and 14 commenters contributed extensively to refining the selection and description of recommendation-worthy research practices. Individual judgments of agreement or disagreement were provided by 29 of the 36 authors and commenters. Of the 21 recommended practices for conducting research with IAT measures presented in this article, all but two were endorsed by 90% or more of those who felt knowledgeable enough to express agreement or disagreement; only 4% of the totality of judgments expressed disagreement. For two practices that were retained despite more than two judgments of disagreement (four for one, five for the other), the bases for those disagreements are described in presenting the recommendations. The article additionally provides recommendations for how to report procedures of IAT measures in empirical articles.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 13 September 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/S00274X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/127111
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer/Psychonomic Societyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519017en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.subjectImplicit Association Testen_GB
dc.subjectimplicit social cognitionen_GB
dc.subjectindirect attitude measurementen_GB
dc.subjectrecommended research practicesen_GB
dc.titleBest research practices for using the Implicit Association Testen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-09-17T12:36:40Z
dc.identifier.issn1554-351X
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited Statesen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Springer via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1554-3528
dc.identifier.journalBehavior Research Methodsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps1://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-05-16
exeter.funder::Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-09-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-09-17T12:32:57Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-17T12:36:44Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.