Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test
dc.contributor.author | Greenwald, AG | |
dc.contributor.author | Brendl, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Cai, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Cvencek, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Dovidio, JF | |
dc.contributor.author | Friese, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Hahn, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Hehman, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Hofmann, W | |
dc.contributor.author | Hughes, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Hussey, I | |
dc.contributor.author | Jordan, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Kirby, TA | |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, CK | |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, JWB | |
dc.contributor.author | Lindgren, KP | |
dc.contributor.author | Maison, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Ostafin, BD | |
dc.contributor.author | Rae, JR | |
dc.contributor.author | Ratliff, KA | |
dc.contributor.author | Spruyt, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Wiers, RW | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-17T12:36:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09-13 | |
dc.description.abstract | Interest in unintended discrimination that can result from implicit attitudes and stereotypes (implicit biases) has stimulated many research investigations. Much of this research has used the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to measure association strengths that are presumed to underlie implicit biases. It had been more than a decade since the last published treatment of recommended best practices for research using IAT measures. After an initial draft by the first author, and continuing through three subsequent drafts, the 22 authors and 14 commenters contributed extensively to refining the selection and description of recommendation-worthy research practices. Individual judgments of agreement or disagreement were provided by 29 of the 36 authors and commenters. Of the 21 recommended practices for conducting research with IAT measures presented in this article, all but two were endorsed by 90% or more of those who felt knowledgeable enough to express agreement or disagreement; only 4% of the totality of judgments expressed disagreement. For two practices that were retained despite more than two judgments of disagreement (four for one, five for the other), the bases for those disagreements are described in presenting the recommendations. The article additionally provides recommendations for how to report procedures of IAT measures in empirical articles. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 13 September 2021 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | ES/S00274X/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/127111 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer/Psychonomic Society | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519017 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Implicit Association Test | en_GB |
dc.subject | implicit social cognition | en_GB |
dc.subject | indirect attitude measurement | en_GB |
dc.subject | recommended research practices | en_GB |
dc.title | Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-17T12:36:40Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1554-351X | |
exeter.place-of-publication | United States | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from Springer via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1554-3528 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Behavior Research Methods | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-05-16 | |
exeter.funder | ::Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-09-13 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-09-17T12:32:57Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-09-17T12:36:44Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.