Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuncombe, SL
dc.contributor.authorBarker, AR
dc.contributor.authorBond, B
dc.contributor.authorEarle, R
dc.contributor.authorVarley-Campbell, J
dc.contributor.authorVlachopoulos, D
dc.contributor.authorWalker, JL
dc.contributor.authorWeston, KL
dc.contributor.authorStylianou, M
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-06T09:29:50Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-04
dc.date.updated2022-05-06T00:56:56Z
dc.description.abstractPurpose 1) To investigate the effectiveness of school-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) interventions in promoting health outcomes of children and adolescents compared with either a control group or other exercise modality; and 2) to explore the intervention characteristics and process outcomes of published school-based HIIT interventions. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science from inception until 31 March 2021. Studies were eligible if 1) participants aged 5–17 years old; 2) a HIIT intervention within a school setting ≥ 2 weeks duration; 3) a control or comparative exercise group; 4) health-related, cognitive, physical activity, nutrition, or program evaluation outcomes; and 5) original research published in English. We conducted meta-analyses between HIIT and control groups for all outcomes with ≥ 4 studies and meta-regressions for all outcomes with ≥ 10 studies. We narratively synthesised results between HIIT and comparative exercise groups. Results Fifty-four papers met eligibility criteria, encompassing 42 unique studies (35 randomised controlled trials; 36 with a high risk of bias). Meta-analyses indicated significant improvements in waist circumference (mean difference (MD) = -2.5cm), body fat percentage (MD = -1.7%), body mass index (standardised mean difference (SMD) = -1.0), cardiorespiratory fitness (SMD = +1.0), resting heart rate (MD = -5bpm), homeostatic model assessment–insulin resistance (MD = -0.7), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (SMD = -0.9) for HIIT compared to the control group. Our narrative synthesis indicated mixed findings between HIIT and other comparative exercise groups. Conclusion School-based HIIT is effective for improving several health outcomes. Future research should address the paucity of information on physical activity and nutrition outcomes and focus on the integration and long-term effectiveness of HIIT interventions within school settings.en_GB
dc.format.extente0266427-e0266427
dc.identifier.citationVol. 17(5), article e0266427en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266427
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/129528
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-0673-6409 (Duncombe, Stephanie L)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-1556-715X (Vlachopoulos, Dimitris)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_GB
dc.rights© 2022 Duncombe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.titleSchool-based high-intensity interval training programs in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-05-06T09:29:50Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Public Library of Science via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: All relevant data are within a Supporting Information file (S4).en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
dc.identifier.journalPLoS ONEen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofPLOS ONE, 17(5)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-03-18
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-05-04
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-05-06T09:28:33Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-05-06T09:29:51Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-05-04


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 Duncombe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Duncombe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.