Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWong, CYE
dc.contributor.authorKirby, TA
dc.contributor.authorRink, F
dc.contributor.authorRyan, MK
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-27T08:49:20Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-25
dc.date.updated2022-06-26T22:39:38Z
dc.description.abstractMany diversity interventions for women are ineffective. One reason for this may be that the field that diversity interventions are usually based on, the social sciences, often do not consider intra-group differences among women. Specifically, differences by racialization may be excluded from such diversity interventions. The present research examines whether racially marginalized women have different diversity interventions needs than White women, and whether organizations are less likely to represent those needs (i.e., intersectional invisibility). Across an open-ended coding (n = 293) and a ranking study (n = 489), Black women noted a need to incorporate intersectional differences, Asian women prioritized methods to address challenges to their authority, and White women indicated a need to address agency perceptions. Improving work-life balance and networks was a shared concern among participants, though we theorized different racially gendered reasons for why these intervention needs are relevant to each group. In Study 3 (n = 92 organizations), we analyzed organizations' websites using word count and textual analysis. Organizations- including the Education, Science, and Research sector- most readily advocated for women through enhancing agency. They were also less likely to mention dealing with perceptions of excessive agency or addressing intersectional considerations. The organizations broadly mentioned other marginalized groups besides women, but rarely did they do so intersectionality. Taken together, our findings demonstrate different intervention priorities across differently racialized groups. We found evidence of intersectional invisibility where organizations were more likely to address agency-enhancing intervention needs while failing to include other intervention needs relevant for Black women and Asian women. We discuss the implications of these findings for organizations, in general, as well as potential implications for the field of academic social sciences.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commissionen_GB
dc.format.extent791572-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.identifier.citationVol. 13, article 791572en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.791572
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/S00274X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber725128en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/130064
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-1091-9275 (Ryan, Michelle K)
dc.identifierScopusID: 8872637600 (Ryan, Michelle K)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35693520en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_package/16775728en_GB
dc.rights© 2022 Wong, Kirby, Rink and Ryan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_GB
dc.subjectdiversity interventionen_GB
dc.subjectgenderen_GB
dc.subjectinclusionen_GB
dc.subjectintersectionalityen_GB
dc.subjectmultiple identitiesen_GB
dc.subjectraceen_GB
dc.titleIntersectional Invisibility in Women's Diversity Interventionsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-06-27T08:49:20Z
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
exeter.article-numberARTN 791572
exeter.place-of-publicationSwitzerland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_package/16775728.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Psychologyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofFront Psychol, 13
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-03-31
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-05-25
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-06-27T08:47:29Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-06-27T08:49:25Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-05-25


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 Wong, Kirby, Rink and Ryan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Wong, Kirby, Rink and Ryan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.