Intersectional Invisibility in Women's Diversity Interventions
dc.contributor.author | Wong, CYE | |
dc.contributor.author | Kirby, TA | |
dc.contributor.author | Rink, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Ryan, MK | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-27T08:49:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05-25 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-06-26T22:39:38Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Many diversity interventions for women are ineffective. One reason for this may be that the field that diversity interventions are usually based on, the social sciences, often do not consider intra-group differences among women. Specifically, differences by racialization may be excluded from such diversity interventions. The present research examines whether racially marginalized women have different diversity interventions needs than White women, and whether organizations are less likely to represent those needs (i.e., intersectional invisibility). Across an open-ended coding (n = 293) and a ranking study (n = 489), Black women noted a need to incorporate intersectional differences, Asian women prioritized methods to address challenges to their authority, and White women indicated a need to address agency perceptions. Improving work-life balance and networks was a shared concern among participants, though we theorized different racially gendered reasons for why these intervention needs are relevant to each group. In Study 3 (n = 92 organizations), we analyzed organizations' websites using word count and textual analysis. Organizations- including the Education, Science, and Research sector- most readily advocated for women through enhancing agency. They were also less likely to mention dealing with perceptions of excessive agency or addressing intersectional considerations. The organizations broadly mentioned other marginalized groups besides women, but rarely did they do so intersectionality. Taken together, our findings demonstrate different intervention priorities across differently racialized groups. We found evidence of intersectional invisibility where organizations were more likely to address agency-enhancing intervention needs while failing to include other intervention needs relevant for Black women and Asian women. We discuss the implications of these findings for organizations, in general, as well as potential implications for the field of academic social sciences. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | European Commission | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 791572- | |
dc.format.medium | Electronic-eCollection | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 13, article 791572 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.791572 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | ES/S00274X/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 725128 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/130064 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-1091-9275 (Ryan, Michelle K) | |
dc.identifier | ScopusID: 8872637600 (Ryan, Michelle K) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35693520 | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_package/16775728 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2022 Wong, Kirby, Rink and Ryan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. | en_GB |
dc.subject | diversity intervention | en_GB |
dc.subject | gender | en_GB |
dc.subject | inclusion | en_GB |
dc.subject | intersectionality | en_GB |
dc.subject | multiple identities | en_GB |
dc.subject | race | en_GB |
dc.title | Intersectional Invisibility in Women's Diversity Interventions | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-27T08:49:20Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-1078 | |
exeter.article-number | ARTN 791572 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | Switzerland | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data Availability Statement: The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_package/16775728. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1664-1078 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Frontiers in Psychology | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Front Psychol, 13 | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-03-31 | |
dc.rights.license | CC BY | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-05-25 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-06-27T08:47:29Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-06-27T08:49:25Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-05-25 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Wong, Kirby, Rink and Ryan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.